Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Cybersecurity

White House Unveils New Cyber Strategy Focused on AI Security and Incident Reporting Changes

Trump administration reveals a new national cyber strategy prioritizing AI security and mandates critical infrastructure incident reporting within 72 hours.

Officials from the Trump administration have announced a set of upcoming cybersecurity policy initiatives aimed at enhancing national security through a new national cyber strategy, updates to federal incident reporting protocols, and a framework for artificial intelligence security collaboration. These developments were reported on Wednesday by Federal News Network and are expected to significantly shape the U.S. approach to cybersecurity moving forward.

During the Information Technology Industry Council’s Intersect Summit on Tuesday, White House National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross detailed the forthcoming national cybersecurity strategy, which will be built around six key pillars. Cairncross emphasized the importance of these pillars, which include shaping adversary behavior, fostering a regulatory environment for industry collaboration, modernizing federal government cybersecurity, securing critical infrastructure, maintaining U.S. dominance in emerging technologies, and addressing the cyber skills and workforce gap.

The proposed changes to cyber incident reporting come through the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA). Nick Andersen, executive assistant director for cybersecurity at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), stated that while CIRCIA mandates critical infrastructure entities to report cyber incidents within 72 hours, final regulations have yet to be implemented. Concerns have been raised by industry groups regarding the scope of the proposed rules, which were initially set for 2024 but have now been postponed until May 2026.

In addition to regulatory updates, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intends to establish an Artificial Intelligence Information Sharing and Analysis Center, or AI-ISAC. This center aims to coordinate threat intelligence related to AI across various critical infrastructure sectors. Complementing this effort, the Office of the National Cyber Director is working on an AI security policy framework designed to integrate security into AI systems while promoting innovation.

Another significant development is the planned establishment of a successor to the Critical Infrastructure Partnership Advisory Council (CIPAC), which DHS dissolved last year. The new entity, tentatively named the Alliance of National Councils for Homeland Operational Resilience, or ANCHOR, seeks to rectify gaps identified in the previous council’s structure and scope.

In related news, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has introduced a directive mandating federal civilian executive branch agencies to enhance security controls for edge devices by removing unsupported hardware and software from their networks. This directive, known as Binding Operational Directive 26-02, underscores the ongoing commitment to bolster cybersecurity across government systems, particularly as new threats emerge.

Additionally, the Department of War has issued guidance aimed at identifying and mitigating threats posed by vendors supporting U.S. military operations. This new guidance standardizes procedures for vetting commercial suppliers, addressing risks associated with foreign adversaries, criminal networks, and extremist organizations that could exploit vendor relationships.

As these initiatives unfold, they represent a comprehensive approach to addressing some of the most pressing cybersecurity challenges facing the United States today. With the evolving threat landscape and the increasing reliance on technology, the administration’s focus on robust cybersecurity measures underscores the critical importance of safeguarding national infrastructure and protecting against adversarial actions.

See also
Rachel Torres
Written By

At AIPressa, my work focuses on exploring the paradox of AI in cybersecurity: it's both our best defense and our greatest threat. I've closely followed how AI systems detect vulnerabilities in milliseconds while attackers simultaneously use them to create increasingly sophisticated malware. My approach: explaining technical complexities in an accessible way without losing the urgency of the topic. When I'm not researching the latest AI-driven threats, I'm probably testing security tools or reading about the next attack vector keeping CISOs awake at night.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

Google and Meta project capital expenditures of $175B and $115B respectively for 2026, signaling a strong growth outlook for Broadcom amid a 23% stock...

AI Tools

Morningstar analysts reveal that Microsoft and ServiceNow could see stock growth of 50% and 100%, respectively, despite recent market fears in the software sector.

Top Stories

Tech giants like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are set to invest over $200 billion annually in AI, straining power grids and labor markets amid...

AI Regulation

IEEE's new Online Mini-MBA program equips executives with essential AI governance skills to enhance ROI and accountability in corporate strategies.

Top Stories

New York's RAISE Act, mirroring California's SB-53, mandates AI developers disclose risk management frameworks and safety incidents, impacting companies grossing over $500M.

Top Stories

Applied Materials faces export delays for high-end chip equipment to China, affecting orders amid a 20% year-to-date stock return and rising AI demand.

Top Stories

Limassol Forum reveals that 20% of the global fleet will be alternative-fuel ready by 2030, as industry leaders address geopolitical shifts and AI integration...

Top Stories

Google achieves a remarkable 15% YoY revenue growth, surpassing $400 billion in annual revenue, but investor concerns linger over AI's measurable impact

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.