David Sacks, the White House’s AI and crypto czar, expressed concerns last month regarding the potential risks posed by excessive caution in artificial intelligence (AI) regulation. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Sacks warned that America could be jeopardizing its position in the global AI race due to what he termed a “self-inflicted injury.” He emphasized that the U.S. might fall behind in innovation if domestic policies become too restrictive.
In a discussion alongside Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce (NYSE:CRM), Sacks highlighted the fragmentation of AI regulation across the United States as a major concern. He pointed out that there are currently around 1,200 bills being considered in state legislatures, each proposing different regulations for AI. This state-level approach, he argued, could present a greater challenge to U.S. leadership in the AI domain than competition from abroad.
Sacks expressed that this regulatory patchwork would particularly impact startups and early-stage companies, which may struggle more than established tech firms to navigate the complex compliance landscape. “If we have 1,200 different AI laws in the states, clamping down on innovation, I worry that we could lose the AI race,” he stated, adding that a unified national market has historically been one of the U.S.’s competitive advantages.
He noted that the current situation diverges from the norm, where companies would typically adhere to a single federal framework. The proliferation of various state regulations could stifle experimentation and hinder new market entrants, which is critical for maintaining a vibrant technology ecosystem.
Sacks connected these regulatory challenges to former President Donald Trump‘s approach to technology policy, which favored rapid innovation led by entrepreneurs rather than government agencies. Moreover, he underscored a cultural divide between Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C., where the tech sector prioritizes speed and risk-taking, while the policymaking process often emphasizes control and deliberation.
Beyond regulatory concerns, Sacks pointed out a significant gap in public attitudes toward AI between the U.S. and countries like China. Citing research from the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, he noted that while only 39% of Americans believe that AI’s benefits outweigh its risks, a striking 83% of respondents in China hold a more positive view of AI’s impact.
This disparity in public sentiment comes as China continues to advance its AI capabilities, with models evolving faster than many experts anticipated. According to Sacks, this has resulted in a narrowing gap between Chinese and U.S. AI systems. While he acknowledged that the U.S. still leads in certain areas, such as AI models and chip technology, he cautioned that decisions driven by pessimism—like imposing restrictive regulations or placing limits on data center construction—could ultimately undermine America’s competitive edge.
“I hope that people will become a little bit more optimistic about this industry,” Sacks remarked, underscoring the importance of fostering a supportive environment for AI innovation. As the global AI landscape continues to evolve, the stakes remain high for the U.S. to maintain its leadership position, particularly in the face of increasing competition and regulatory complexities.
As the dialogue around AI regulation intensifies, the future of U.S. innovation may depend on striking a balance between necessary oversight and the need for an unencumbered path for technological advancement.
See also
Global Leaders Gather at India-AI Impact Summit 2026 to Shape AI’s Future, February 16-20
xAI’s Grok Chatbot Generates 4.4M Images, Half Sexualized, Amid Global Backlash
CEOs in CEE Prioritize Short-Term Gains as AI Adoption Lags, Risking Long-Term Growth
ByteDance Invests Billions in AI Infrastructure, Launches Doubao with 100M Users Amid Global Challenges
Germany”s National Team Prepares for World Cup Qualifiers with Disco Atmosphere
