Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, expressed skepticism about OpenAI’s approach to investing in AI compute resources, highlighting the complexities involved in financing AI infrastructure. In a recent podcast, Amodei discussed the intricate mathematics behind AI spending, suggesting that systems capable of achieving levels akin to Nobel Prize winners could emerge within a few years. However, he cautioned that translating this capability into revenue may not happen as quickly as anticipated.
Amodei pointed to the potential economic applications of AI, such as curing diseases. While AI could theoretically develop cures, these innovations must still navigate the lengthy processes of biological discovery, drug manufacturing, and regulatory approval. As a result, even with accelerated advancements, it could take years before profits materialize from such breakthroughs.
Anthropic has seen impressive growth in its revenue, climbing from zero to $100 million in 2023, reaching $1 billion in 2024, and escalating to between $9 billion and $10 billion in 2025, according to Amodei. By early 2026, he stated that annualized revenue had reached $14 billion. Despite this meteoric rise, Amodei warned against assuming this growth rate would remain constant. He explained that even a modest miscalculation in projected revenue could jeopardize the company’s financial stability.
“I could buy $1 trillion of compute that starts at the end of 2027. If my revenue is not $1 trillion dollars, if it’s even $800 billion, there’s no force on earth, there’s no hedge on earth that could stop me from going bankrupt if I buy that much compute,” he warned. He emphasized that being off by just a single year in growth estimates could be catastrophic for the company.
Amodei suggested that some rivals may not fully grasp the risks associated with aggressive compute investments, implying that they are pursuing strategies that sound appealing without careful consideration. While he did not name specific competitors, his comments appeared to target OpenAI directly, indicating a level of competitive tension in the AI landscape.
In terms of future investments, Anthropic reportedly plans to invest in at least ten gigawatts of compute over the next several years. In contrast, OpenAI’s ambitions are more expansive; the company announced partnerships with major players like Nvidia, Broadcom, Oracle, and AMD last year amounting to over 30 gigawatts of compute capacity, though specific details of these arrangements remain vague.
“We’re buying a lot. We’re buying a hell of a lot. We’re buying an amount that’s comparable to what the biggest players in the game are buying,” Amodei said. However, he raised concerns about the feasibility of scaling to even larger investments, referencing the lack of available resources and the unpredictability of technological breakthroughs. “But if you’re asking me, ‘Why haven’t we signed $10 trillion of compute starting in mid-2027?’ First of all, it can’t be produced. There isn’t that much in the world. But second, what if the country of geniuses comes, but it comes in mid-2028 instead of mid-2027? You go bankrupt,” he cautioned.
As the AI industry continues to evolve at a rapid pace, Amodei’s insights reveal the precarious balance that companies must navigate between ambitious investment in compute resources and the uncertain timeline for revenue generation. With the stakes high in this competitive environment, the decisions made today could have long-term implications for the future of AI development.
See also
Sandisk’s 1,220% Surge Outpaces Micron: Why It’s the Superior AI Investment Now
AI’s $660B Boom Sparks Market Volatility as Investors Fear Job Disruption and Profit Margins
Blueberry Markets Reveals 2026 Broker Review with Key Insights on Regulation and Trading Conditions
Fintech Xchange 2026: Industry Leaders Address AI, Ethics, and Consumer Empowerment
Germany”s National Team Prepares for World Cup Qualifiers with Disco Atmosphere
