As global volatility becomes increasingly commonplace due to factors such as warfare, sanctions, and climate instability, businesses are rushing to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This shift is aimed at enabling faster decision-making, improving planning processes, and enhancing resilience against unpredictable disruptions. However, a closer examination reveals that the integration of AI tools is creating new challenges that may undermine these intended benefits.
Jonathan Jackman, Regional Vice President EMEA at Kinaxis, points out that many organizations have embraced early generative AI tools, but these systems often operate alongside existing processes rather than being fully integrated into core decision-making frameworks. While this approach may accelerate data analysis, it frequently results in disconnected systems that lack essential data context, ultimately increasing operational risks instead of mitigating them.
The emergence of agentic AI, which can both analyze and act on information, signifies a transformative step in leveraging AI for supply chain decision-making. However, Jackman warns that operating such systems without adequate context or safeguards can lead to immediate and costly consequences, including sending stock to the wrong markets and triggering regulatory violations.
As businesses navigate the complexities of AI adoption, they confront a pivotal choice: either risk falling into a trap of superficial generative AI tools, or take a more disciplined approach that integrates AI into decision-making workflows. The former scenario, according to Jackman, allows tools to operate with siloed data, producing recommendations devoid of necessary context and accountability. This lack of integration can have cascading effects across inventory, finance, logistics, and customer service, ultimately eroding trust and increasing risks.
In contrast, adopting a more responsible strategy where AI is seamlessly embedded into decision-making can empower organizations to not only react to disruptions but also to anticipate them. Advanced agentic AI systems that access real-time data and understand business constraints can coordinate responses across the enterprise. Such integration enables companies to act swiftly and decisively in crisis situations, aligning trade-offs and minimizing the potential for escalation.
As the push for more autonomous AI grows, the principle of human oversight remains paramount. Despite widespread fears of AI replacing human jobs, well-designed agentic systems can complement human decision-making, ensuring that transparency and accountability are maintained. Human operators maintain control over critical decision processes, establishing guidelines and objectives for AI systems while approving significant decisions. This governance framework is most effective when AI systems are grounded in real-time data, offering a reliable source of truth.
In this setup, AI can focus on routine operational tasks such as monitoring signals and generating response options, allowing human decision-makers to concentrate on areas where ethical considerations and contextual understanding are vital. When agentic systems are integrated into decision-making workflows from the outset, they can automatically block unsafe or non-compliant options, enhancing overall efficiency and safety.
The urgency for transparency in AI operations is heightened as regulatory bodies, especially in regions like the EU, intensify scrutiny over business practices. Maintaining clear visibility into how decisions are made is crucial for compliance and fostering trust. A collaborative human-agent partnership built on explainability and governance offers a pathway for organizations to scale decision-making while preserving both trust and resilience.
For instance, in a high-stakes scenario such as a pharmaceutical supplier experiencing a sudden shortage of a key material due to regulatory changes, the stakes are significant. Traditional AI tools, functioning in isolation, may lead to chaotic decision-making under pressure, often with outdated or incomplete information. In contrast, an embedded agentic system can simultaneously identify supply chain issues and evaluate inventory risks, utilizing real-time data across supply, logistics, and financial parameters.
In this scenario, AI generates coordinated response options for human leaders to assess and approve, allowing for informed decision-making that aligns with compliance rules and operational realities. The result is not just speed but also reliability, ensuring that critical medicines reach patients on time while adhering to all regulatory standards.
As global uncertainty escalates, the emphasis for companies is no longer on the speed of AI adoption but rather on doing so responsibly. The most successful organizations will be those that integrate intelligence into their core decision-making processes while maintaining clear rules and human oversight. In an environment where trust is the cornerstone of effective decision-making, it becomes clear that the future lies not in merely accelerating processes but in building a robust framework that manages risk while enhancing agility and resilience.
See also
AI Regulation Escalates as BIS Warns of Systemic Risks in Banking Operations
Germany”s National Team Prepares for World Cup Qualifiers with Disco Atmosphere
95% of AI Projects Fail in Companies According to MIT
AI in Food & Beverages Market to Surge from $11.08B to $263.80B by 2032
Satya Nadella Supports OpenAI’s $100B Revenue Goal, Highlights AI Funding Needs
