Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Warner Bros. Discovery Sues Midjourney for $150K per Copyright Infringement Claim

Warner Bros. Discovery sues Midjourney for $150,000 per copyright infringement, escalating the legal battle over AI’s impact on intellectual property rights.

Warner Bros. Discovery has filed a lawsuit against Midjourney for copyright infringement, joining industry giants Disney and Comcast’s Universal in a growing legal battle over the implications of artificial intelligence in film and television. The complaint, lodged on Thursday in a California federal court, accuses Midjourney of operating a commercial subscription service that utilizes AI technology developed using unauthorized copies of Warner Bros. Discovery’s copyrighted materials.

The lawsuit claims that Midjourney has profited from what it calls “brazen” infringement of Warner Bros. Discovery’s intellectual property, specifically highlighting characters such as Bugs Bunny, Superman, Batman, the Flash, Wonder Woman, Scooby-Doo, and the Powerpuff Girls. “Midjourney thinks it is above the law,” the complaint alleges, underscoring the severity of the situation as the entertainment industry grapples with the rapid advancements in AI technology.

A spokesperson for Warner Bros. Discovery stated, “The heart of what we do is develop stories and characters to entertain our audiences, bringing to life the vision and passion of our creative partners. Midjourney is blatantly and purposefully infringing copyrighted works, and we filed this suit to protect our content, our partners, and our investments.”

According to court documents, the lawsuit argues that Midjourney creates “consumer confusion” by misleading its subscribers into believing that the extensive copying of images and videos generated by its service is authorized by Warner Bros. Discovery. The company is seeking damages of $150,000 for each infringed work.

This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of legal actions against AI technologies that utilize copyrighted materials without permission. Earlier this month, Anthropic resolved a significant copyright lawsuit for $15 billion, and the ongoing complaints from Disney and Universal describe Midjourney as a “bottomless pit of plagiarism.”

As the entertainment industry continues to navigate the complex intersection of creativity and technology, the implications of AI on intellectual property rights remain uncertain. The outcome of this legal battle may set important precedents for how AI-generated content is treated under copyright law, potentially reshaping industry practices and standards moving forward.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Regulation

California implements new AI regulations in 2026, including protections for minors and accountability for deepfake content, positioning itself as a national leader in AI...

Top Stories

xAI accuses OpenAI of poaching key talent and stealing trade secrets, seeking $7M in damages amid escalating tensions between Elon Musk and the AI...

Top Stories

Faraday Future proposes a 34% increase in authorized shares and a name change to Faraday Future AI Electric Vehicle Inc. at its February 13,...

AI Regulation

In 2025, 38 states enacted nearly 100 new AI laws, creating a chaotic regulatory landscape that stifles innovation for smaller companies while favoring larger...

Top Stories

Midjourney unveils transformative updates to its Style Creator, enhancing artistic discovery with adaptive features that learn user preferences for a more fluid creative process.

AI Regulation

New York's RAISE Act mandates $500M revenue threshold for AI developers, enforcing stringent safety measures effective January 2027 to mitigate catastrophic risks.

Top Stories

Oracle plunges 30% this quarter, risking its worst drop since 2001, amid concerns over financing a $300 billion AI infrastructure buildout.

AI Regulation

Trump's Executive Order establishes a federal AI framework, preempting state regulations to boost U.S. competitiveness against China, sparking bipartisan backlash.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.