Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Finance

OpenAI Partners Accumulate $96 Billion in Debt Amid AI Growth Challenges

OpenAI’s partners amass $96 billion in debt as they struggle to meet $1.4 trillion in commitments amidst soaring AI operational costs and inadequate revenues.

Companies providing data centers, chips, and “compute” processing power to OpenAI have accrued approximately $96 billion in debt to finance their operations, according to an analysis by the Financial Times. This substantial debt burden underscores the AI sector’s rising reliance on borrowed capital, particularly its dependence on the loss-making AI startup, OpenAI.

Currently, the revenues generated by AI companies and many of the data center operators expanding rapidly to support them are insufficient to cover their extensive build-out costs. OpenAI has made commitments totaling $1.4 trillion to secure the energy and computing resources necessary for future operations, yet it projects only $20 billion in revenues for the current year. A recent analysis by HSBC indicated that even if OpenAI surpasses $200 billion in revenue by 2030, it will still require an additional $207 billion in funding to remain operational.

The Financial Times detailed the debt acquired by OpenAI’s partners as follows: $30 billion borrowed by SoftBank, Oracle, and CoreWeave; $28 billion in loans from Blue Owl Capital and Crusoe; and $38 billion in ongoing negotiations with Oracle, Vantage, and their financial institutions. This totals $96 billion in debt.

The reliance on debt for AI infrastructure is a recent phenomenon; prior to this year, most investment in AI expansion was financed through cash reserves of major tech firms like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta. Investors will closely monitor how CoreWeave manages its debt, as the company reported $3.7 billion in current debt, $10.3 billion in non-current debt, and $39.1 billion in future lease obligations for data centers in its Q3 earnings report. Despite projecting only $5 billion in revenue this year, CoreWeave cites a $56 billion “revenue backlog.”

All mentioned companies were contacted for comments, but CoreWeave declined to respond when reached by Fortune.

Separately, the five major hyperscalers—Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle—have collectively taken on $121 billion in new debt this year to fund their AI operations, according to Bank of America. This figure exceeds four times the average debt of $28 billion these companies issued annually over the past five years.

This surge in investment-grade corporate debt is significantly impacting credit markets, as noted by analysts at Bank of America. They highlighted that the weeks leading up to Thanksgiving typically represent a peak period for investment-grade supply, with around $50 billion tracked for the current week and approximately $220 billion over the past four weeks—about 70% higher than the usual volume for this time of year.

Furthermore, the increase in supply from tech firms correlates with a substantial rise in spreads—the additional interest yield demanded by debt buyers over the risk-free rate—in the credit default swap (CDS) market. According to Deutsche Bank, CDS serve as an insurance mechanism on corporate debt, compensating holders in the event of a default. A rise in CDS yields suggests an elevated perception of default risk. Notably, Oracle’s five-year CDS has widened by approximately 60 basis points to 104 bps since late September, while CoreWeave’s has surged by around 280 bps to about 640 bps during the same period.

While the long-term implications of this shift remain unclear, analysts suggest that these recent trends mark a new phase in the AI boom—one in which investors are increasingly inclined to hedge their risks and where public credit markets are increasingly called upon to finance growing capital expenditure needs. The reliance on free cash flow from hyperscalers may no longer be sufficient to sustain this rapidly evolving sector.

See also
Marcus Chen
Written By

At AIPressa, my work focuses on analyzing how artificial intelligence is redefining business strategies and traditional business models. I've covered everything from AI adoption in Fortune 500 companies to disruptive startups that are changing the rules of the game. My approach: understanding the real impact of AI on profitability, operational efficiency, and competitive advantage, beyond corporate hype. When I'm not writing about digital transformation, I'm probably analyzing financial reports or studying AI implementation cases that truly moved the needle in business.

You May Also Like

AI Government

US imposes 25% tariffs on Nvidia and AMD AI chips, channeling revenue from China sales directly to the treasury amid rising trade tensions.

Top Stories

Samsung is set to supply its advanced Exynos 2600 processor for OpenAI's upcoming AI earbuds, projected to ship 40 million units in the first...

Top Stories

OpenAI invests undisclosed millions in Merge Labs to develop non-invasive brain-computer interfaces, positioning it as a competitor to Neuralink.

AI Regulation

OpenAI’s ChatGPT Health faces scrutiny after a user ingested sodium bromide due to misleading AI-generated information, highlighting urgent regulatory needs.

AI Regulation

Miles Brundage launches AVERI with $7.5M funding to push for independent audits of AI models, advocating for external accountability in AI safety.

AI Marketing

Higgsfield secures $80M in funding, boosting its valuation to $1.3B as demand for AI-driven video content surges, targeting social media marketers.

AI Business

OpenAI launches ChatGPT Health, driving 200 million weekly healthcare queries as AI reshapes patient education and tackles rising U.S. healthcare costs.

Top Stories

OpenAI warns that China's AI capabilities have narrowed the competitive gap to just three months, raising stakes in the global tech race.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.