Artificial intelligence is reshaping risk profiles across industries, prompting significant adaptations in the insurance market. Currently, many AI-related risks are implicitly covered under traditional insurance policies, a phenomenon referred to as “silent AI” coverage. This mirrors the early handling of cyber risks, where coverage was provided under standard policies before dedicated cyber insurance emerged. Although current policies—such as cyber and liability insurance—may cover AI incidents, the lack of explicit mention of “AI” raises concerns of ambiguity. Insurers are responding by clarifying coverage terms, either through endorsements that explicitly affirm AI risk coverage or exclusions aimed at avoiding unforeseen exposures. Dr. Anat Lior’s article in the Connecticut Insurance Law Journal suggests that we can soon expect policies to directly address AI risks, marking the end of the era of silent coverage.
As it stands, companies frequently depend on a patchwork of policies to address AI risks, with no single policy capable of encompassing all potential AI-related perils. For instance, a data breach caused by AI falls under cyber insurance, while an AI-induced injury is typically categorized under general liability. This fragmented approach reveals critical gaps, underscoring the necessity for risk managers to discern overlaps and limitations within their coverage. The AI insurance market is projected to grow significantly, with forecasts estimating premiums to reach around $4.7 billion by 2032. Recent developments include specialized AI endorsements, with some cyber policies explicitly addressing AI-driven events such as data poisoning or AI-generated content. Nonetheless, Dr. Lior notes that insurers anticipate AI risks will gradually integrate into mainstream products as more data becomes available.
The evolution of AI coverage draws parallels to the trajectory of cyber insurance. Initially, cyber losses were inadvertently covered under property or liability policies—a phase termed “silent cyber.” As the risks became better understood, insurers began to introduce cyber exclusions and develop dedicated cyber policies. Dr. Lior posits that the insurance industry is now at a similar inflection point concerning AI risks. Insurers are tightening terms, introducing clearer language regarding coverage for losses stemming from autonomous decisions or algorithmic errors. As a result, meticulous review of policy language during renewals is becoming increasingly vital.
Coverage by Traditional Policies
Most organizations will likely address AI risks using existing insurance policies. A summary of Dr. Lior’s findings illustrates how 12 common policy types interact with AI risks, highlighting their respective roles, limitations, exclusions, and example scenarios. For instance, cyber insurance covers data breaches and privacy violations but typically requires a breach trigger, leaving gaps for losses related to a company’s own data. Similarly, general liability insurance addresses injuries from AI systems but excludes coverage for financial losses, often leaving companies unprotected if AI-driven advice leads to economic harm.
As demonstrated, while many AI-related risks can be mapped to existing insurance policies, each has limitations. An AI-related data breach may be covered under cyber insurance, yet if the breach involves confidential data, the company may face a significant gap. Companies are encouraged to analyze their policies and identify potential exposures that may not be adequately covered.
Insurers are also adapting their underwriting practices in light of AI exposures, facing challenges such as data scarcity. With limited historical loss data specific to AI incidents, insurers often draw analogies to known risks, utilizing scenario analyses to better inform their underwriting. As part of this process, questions regarding AI usage and controls are becoming more detailed in underwriting applications. Insurers are encouraging clients to provide thorough answers and establish strong governance frameworks around their AI systems, which can positively influence coverage terms.
Notably, large tech firms developing advanced AI technologies frequently self-insure a portion of their risks. For example, insights from Dr. Lior’s research reveal that a major retailer’s risk manager reported no specific “AI insurance” product was purchased, relying instead on existing coverage. In contrast, smaller firms, which are more likely to seek insurance solutions for AI risks, may find greater engagement from insurers. Transparency regarding AI activities is vital in this landscape, as it can help avert complications and mitigate risks.
The regulatory environment surrounding AI insurance remains fluid. While there are currently no widespread mandates requiring companies to carry AI liability insurance, targeted requirements could emerge, particularly for high-risk AI sectors like autonomous vehicles. The European Union has been considering an AI liability fund, although the final AI Act focuses primarily on compliance rather than imposing blanket insurance mandates. In the United States, while states like California are exploring strict liability for AI developers, there remains no federal requirement for AI insurance.
As the insurance landscape evolves, proactive engagement from risk managers is essential. Organizations are advised to map AI risks to their existing policies, pinpointing any gaps in coverage. Discussions with brokers and insurers should address these gaps, including possible endorsements or new policies tailored to specific AI risks. Furthermore, monitoring regulatory changes like the EU AI Act will be critical for ensuring that insurance policies adapt accordingly.
In conclusion, while AI introduces new risks, it simultaneously drives innovation within the insurance sector. As businesses increasingly rely on AI technologies, robust insurance coverage can provide a financial safety net, fostering confidence among stakeholders. By aligning risk management strategies with AI strategies, companies can navigate the complexities of this emerging landscape, paving the way for safer integration of AI technologies into society.
See also
AI Adoption Outpaces Governance: Report Reveals 97% Ignore Energy Impacts
OpenAI’s Rogue AI Safeguards: Decoding the 2025 Safety Revolution
US AI Developments in 2025 Set Stage for 2026 Compliance Challenges and Strategies
Trump Drafts Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Centralizing Authority Under Federal Control
California Court Rules AI Misuse Heightens Lawyer’s Responsibilities in Noland Case
