Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

AI Tools’ Financial Advice Accuracy Plummets to 56% According to New Study

New study reveals AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini deliver only 56% accurate financial advice, risking costly user mistakes in critical decisions.

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences both our personal and professional lives, skepticism remains regarding its effectiveness in providing reliable financial advice. While tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini have gained traction for tasks ranging from composing wedding speeches to drafting legal documents, their capabilities in finance are still under scrutiny.

AI’s expansion into finance seems like a natural progression, as it can potentially democratize access to important information such as investment strategies and tax guidelines for those who might feel overwhelmed by traditional financial services. However, a recent investigation by consumer watchdog Which? has revealed significant limitations in the financial advice these AI tools can offer.

AI Tools Tested for Financial Advice

Which? evaluated six AI tools, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Gemini AI Overview (AIO), Microsoft’s Copilot, Meta AI, and Perplexity, by posing 40 common personal finance questions. The results were alarming: many responses were found to be “inaccurate, unclear, and risky,” potentially leading users to costly financial mistakes.

According to Andrew Laughlin, a technology expert at Which?, this investigation highlighted that “everyday use of AI is soaring, but when it comes to getting the answers you need, the devil is in the details.” Particularly troubling was the discovery that both ChatGPT and Copilot failed to spot a deliberate error regarding the individual savings account (ISA) allowance, mistakenly advising users based on an incorrect £25,000 limit rather than the accurate £20,000, risking noncompliance with HMRC regulations.

Another test involved asking these AI tools about tax codes and claiming tax refunds. Both ChatGPT and Perplexity directed users towards paid services instead of the free options provided by the UK government.

Understanding AI’s Limitations in Finance

The organizations behind these AI tools maintain that users should verify any information provided before taking action. Laughlin emphasized the importance of phrasing questions clearly and checking the sources used for AI-generated answers. He urged consumers to seek professional advice, especially for complex issues such as legal matters and major financial decisions.

This is not the first instance of AI facing criticism over its financial advisory capabilities. A previous study conducted by financial education specialists Investing Insiders assessed AI tools’ accuracy across 100 finance-related questions. The findings showed that AI tools were correct only 56% of the time, misleading for 27%, and incorrect for 17%, indicating that nearly half of the answers provided could potentially mislead users seeking financial guidance.

Antonia Medlicott, founder and managing director at Investing Insiders, expressed concern over AI’s misleading nature, particularly as many individuals rely on it for critical decisions ranging from savings to retirement planning.

Addressing the User Experience and Education Gaps

In contrast, Mitali Deypurkaystha, an AI strategist at Impact Icon AI, attributes some inaccuracies to user error rather than AI failure. She points out that many users may not be asking the right questions or using the appropriate tools for their financial inquiries. Deypurkaystha advocates for enhanced financial literacy programs to help users navigate AI tools more effectively, arguing that the focus should be on teaching individuals how to utilize AI rather than discouraging its use altogether.

In summary, while AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini hold promise in delivering quick answers for financial queries, their current reliability remains questionable. As regulations are not yet in place for AI financial advice, consumers must tread carefully. As David Horowitz, head of financial planning at Gerald Edelman, suggests, using AI for financial decisions should complement—not substitute—expert, regulated advice tailored to personal financial situations.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

Grok's bikini image scandal sparks global backlash, raising urgent calls for stricter AI privacy regulations as Elon Musk faces intensified scrutiny.

AI Technology

AMD launches Ryzen AI 400 processors that claim a 30% multitasking boost over Intel's Ultra 9, featuring 5.2 GHz speeds and 60 TOPS for...

Top Stories

AI's initial hype has tempered, with Goldman Sachs noting modest immediate economic impacts despite robust investment, as companies like IBM focus on upskilling workers...

Top Stories

Tech leaders at the 2025 IEEE AI Summit, including Google and Microsoft, united to redefine AI deployment, emphasizing reliability and real-world applications in critical...

AI Technology

Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadella announces a strategic shift to integrated AI systems, aiming to enhance productivity and collaboration across industries.

Top Stories

Microsoft reports $77.7B Q1 revenue with cloud growth at 26%, yet faces rising skepticism over AI quality and monetization prospects.

AI Technology

Nvidia announces its next-gen Rubin AI chips are in full production and set to launch in late 2026, promising transformative advancements in physical AI...

Top Stories

Twilio's Q3 revenue surged 15% to $1.3B, with forecasts predicting $5B in 2025, highlighting its strong position in AI-driven customer engagement.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.