Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Google Refutes Claims of Using Gmail for AI Training Amid Malwarebytes Controversy

Google firmly denies allegations of using Gmail content for training its Gemini AI, following Malwarebytes’ misleading claims and subsequent correction.

Google has firmly rejected allegations suggesting it has been accessing users’ personal Gmail accounts to train its AI models. This response follows a warning from cybersecurity firm Malwarebytes, which reported last week that new features enabled Google’s AI to access private emails and files.

Malwarebytes later issued a significant correction, acknowledging that its initial interpretation of the situation may have been misleading. The company stated that the “way Google recently rewrote and surfaced [the features] led a lot of people (including us) to believe Gmail content might be used to train Google’s AI models, and that users were being opted in automatically.” Upon further examination of Google’s documentation and additional reporting, Malwarebytes conceded that the initial claims did not appear to be accurate.

A Google spokesperson also characterized the assertion as “misleading,” confirming that the company has not altered any user settings. “Gmail Smart Features have existed for many years, and we do not use your Gmail content for training our Gemini AI model,” the spokesperson stated. They emphasized that the company maintains transparency regarding changes to its terms of service and policies.

The uproar surrounding this issue underscores a broader backlash against technology companies that are perceived to be pushing AI capabilities onto users without adequate consent. Other platforms, such as SoundCloud and WeTransfer, have faced scrutiny for quietly updating their terms of service to allow the training of AI models on user-generated content. This has fueled skepticism and concern about user privacy and data handling practices within the tech industry.

As the debate over AI ethics continues to unfold, questions about transparency and user consent remain paramount. The ongoing scrutiny of major tech firms reflects a growing public wariness regarding how personal data is utilized, particularly in training AI systems that are becoming increasingly prevalent across various sectors.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Research

EchoLeak exposes a critical vulnerability in Microsoft 365 Copilot, highlighting the urgent need for advanced AI security measures to prevent data leaks.

AI Generative

NWS confirms AI-generated map created fictitious Idaho towns, raising critical concerns over public safety and the reliability of technology in forecasting.

AI Regulation

Florida House Speaker-designate Sam Garrison anticipates a contentious 2026 session on AI regulation, spotlighting DeSantis' proposed "Citizen Bill of Rights for AI" amid rising...

Top Stories

Louisville Metro partners with Govstream.ai and appoints Pamela McKnight as Chief AI Officer to enhance permitting processes in a $2 million initiative.

Top Stories

Meta Platforms faces scrutiny over its stock dip amid concerns of a potential China AI acquisition, despite a 26.25% revenue surge to $51.2B last...

Top Stories

Anthropic seeks $10 billion in funding to boost its valuation to $350 billion amid rising concerns of an AI bubble, as competition with OpenAI...

AI Finance

Construction finance teams at Acumatica Summit 2026 leverage AI tools to cut billing errors by 40%, enhancing cash flow and operational efficiency.

Top Stories

Global markets face rising volatility as U.S. policy shifts and AI regulatory uncertainty threaten to reshape investment strategies, with tech firms comprising one-third of...

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.