Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

KERI Symposium Reveals Need for New AI Competition Policies to Foster Innovation and Fairness

KERI’s symposium underscores the urgent need for Korea to revamp AI competition policies to boost innovation and ensure fairness in an evolving market landscape.

Korea’s policymakers and researchers are at a critical junction as they seek to safeguard market fairness while fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI). As AI technologies continue to reshape market dynamics, experts emphasize the importance of redesigning competition policies to support innovation while ensuring transparency and trust within digital markets.

Symposium Highlights Evolution of Competition Policy

On November 13, the Korea Economic Research Institute (KERI) hosted a joint symposium titled “AI and Digital Innovation: Implications for Competition Policy” at the FKI Tower Conference Center in Seoul. This event was co-hosted with the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency and the Korea Academic Society of Industrial Organization (KASIO).

The focal point of the symposium was the necessity for Korea’s competition framework to adapt in response to the structural changes brought about by AI and data-driven industries. Experts noted that while AI innovation has the potential to drive economic growth, it also introduces complex competition risks that traditional policies are ill-equipped to manage.

In his opening remarks, Jeong Cheol, Chief Policy Representative of the Federation of Korean Industries and President of KERI, stated, “As AI transforms industrial structures, government and companies must work together to create new rules for competition that are both fair and flexible.”

The Challenge of AI to Existing Competition Rules

Research Fellow Yoo Min-hee from KERI discussed how the emergence of generative AI is altering market competition, highlighting that these complex dynamics are increasing market uncertainty and undermining the global competitiveness of domestic firms. She underscored the need for the government to prioritize fairness and transparency while promoting industry-led self-regulation and collaborative frameworks to balance innovation with equity.

“The government should keep fairness and transparency as core principles, while combining industry-led self-regulation and joint agreements to build a new AI competition-policy framework where innovation and fairness coexist,” said Yoo Min-hee.

Another significant presentation by Lee Jin-hyung of the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency addressed the implications of “garden leave” practices—paid non-compete agreements that restrict AI professionals from transitioning to competitors for a defined period. Lee cautioned that overly restrictive employment rules could stifle innovation and limit labor mobility, advocating for a more balanced approach.

“Balanced guidelines are needed to harmonize corporate-interest protection with the specific characteristics of each industry,” stressed Lee Jin-hyung.

Transitioning Focus: Protecting Competition, Not Competitors

A consensus emerged among panelists that Korea’s competition policy should shift from protecting individual companies to safeguarding the overall process of competition. Experts advocated for regulations that account for the rapid pace of technological convergence, the significance of data ownership, and the increasing concentration of AI capabilities among a few dominant players.

They called for sector-specific monitoring systems that reflect the diversity of industries rather than relying on uniform standards, enabling regulators to swiftly address emerging AI-related risks while minimizing unnecessary interventions that could stifle innovation.

Implications for Korea’s AI and Startup Ecosystem

The ongoing debate over AI-era competition policy has profound implications for Korea’s burgeoning startup ecosystem. New generations of Korean AI startups are entering markets that are increasingly dominated by large-scale platforms, where access to data, computational resources, and strategic partnerships often dictate their survival. This is especially pertinent as the government works on its AI Transformation (AX) strategy to position Korea among the world’s top three AI powerhouses.

A policy shift toward “trust-based, transparent, and flexible regulation”—as proposed during the symposium—could significantly level the playing field for startups and small to medium enterprises (SMEs) focused on specialized AI applications. Furthermore, it would likely influence how Korean AI companies engage in international competition, aligning their approaches with broader regulatory frameworks being discussed in the EU, Japan, and the United States.

The symposium’s discussions resonate throughout Asia’s emerging digital economies: sustainable AI innovation requires not only technological advancement but also institutional frameworks that guarantee open, equitable, and collaborative markets.

Towards a Fair and Adaptive AI Market Framework

The KERI-led discussions indicate a broader national shift toward AI governance designed to support innovation while preventing the concentration of market power. Policymakers are increasingly recognizing that outdated competition rules could hinder experimentation and delay digital transformation.

As South Korea aims to draft a comprehensive framework for AI Basic Law this year, the subsequent phase of its AI policy will likely involve establishing structured guidelines for market monitoring, self-regulatory agreements within industries, and transparent data-sharing standards.

If successfully implemented, these measures could position Korea as a model for fair-market economies driven by AI innovation in the Asia-Pacific region.

Stay Ahead in Korea’s Startup Scene
Get real-time insights, funding updates, and policy shifts shaping Korea’s innovation ecosystem.
➡️ Follow KoreaTechDesk on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Threads, Bluesky, Telegram, Facebook, and WhatsApp Channel.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Government

South Korea's Ministry of SMEs and Startups invests KRW 10 million in six AI startups to revolutionize tailored support for SMEs using public datasets.

Top Stories

Korea's AI Privacy Public-Private Policy Council, co-chaired by PIPC's Song Kyung-hee, aims to redefine data governance for autonomous systems by 2026.

AI Government

South Korea's Ministry of SMEs launches a 2026 AI program with 14 billion KRW to empower local governments and transform regional manufacturing ecosystems.

AI Finance

South Korea's Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol pledges to democratize AI access for all citizens while driving extensive support for local firms in critical sectors.

AI Government

Cybersecurity breaches in South Korea surged 26% to 2,383 incidents in 2025, driven by AI-enhanced attack strategies targeting critical sectors like finance and healthcare.

AI Education

MediaGen debuts E-Baigle, an AI-driven English learning platform at the 2026 Korea Education Fair, enhancing speech proficiency and targeting diverse learners.

Top Stories

Elice Group CEO Kim Jaewon has been nominated to chair Korea Startup Forum, heralding a pivotal shift toward AI-driven policy reform as KOSPO targets...

Top Stories

South Korea enacts the world's first AI Basic Act, mandating AI disclosure and labeling, raising compliance concerns that could stifle local startup innovation.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.