Anthropic has officially launched “Claude’s Constitution,” an 84-page open-source document aimed at establishing ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence (AI) models worldwide. This significant step comes as the urgency of addressing AI safety issues intensifies with the approach of artificial general intelligence (AGI).
The release marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of AI governance, as “Claude’s Constitution” departs from traditional rule-based safety strategies. Instead of relying on a list of prohibitions, such as avoiding sensitive topics or harmful inquiries, the document emphasizes cultivating the AI’s judgment and values.
In contrast to previous training methods that resembled behavioral reinforcement, Anthropic’s approach presents a more pedagogical framework, fostering a non-human entity capable of moral awareness. The document serves as a fundamental authority guiding Claude’s behavior, defining its identity and ethical perspective in a complex world.
Anthropic’s shift from rigid rules to a focus on values represents a broader paradigm change within the sector. The research team acknowledges that previous approaches were often fragile and difficult to generalize, given the complexities of real-world scenarios. By prioritizing judgment and ethical considerations, Anthropic aims to prepare Claude to make sound decisions even in unprecedented situations.
The core principle of “Claude’s Constitution” revolves around the importance of explanation—providing context to the rules that govern the AI’s behavior. Anthropic posits that if Claude understands the underlying intentions of its guidelines, it will be better equipped to align with human expectations in novel circumstances.
Value Priorities: Safety First
Within the document, a hierarchy of values is outlined, placing “Broadly Safe” at the top. This prioritization reflects Anthropic’s acknowledgment of the imperfections inherent in current AI training technologies, noting that models may inadvertently absorb harmful values. Thus, “Corrigibility,” or the model’s need to accept human oversight and correction, is emphasized as a crucial safety feature.
Anthropic explicitly notes that while Claude may express objections, it should never attempt to undermine the mechanisms of human supervision. This approach addresses concerns regarding the potential risks of superintelligence, aiming for Claude to act as a cooperative entity that adheres to human constraints.
On an ethical level, the constitution mandates a high standard of honesty, requiring Claude to avoid any form of misleading information, including “white lies.” Unlike human interactions where small inaccuracies may be socially acceptable, Anthropic insists that AI must maintain unwavering trustworthiness in its outputs. While Claude is encouraged to express itself with “wit, grace, and deep concern,” it should avoid deceptive practices.
In commercial settings, “Claude’s Constitution” delineates a “Principal Hierarchy” among Anthropic, operators, and end-users. This framework addresses potential conflicts of interest, where Claude must navigate between the instructions of operators and the rights of users. While operators have commercial interests, Claude is tasked with prioritizing user integrity when there is a conflict, although it will generally follow operator instructions as long as they do not compromise user interests or ethical standards.
A thought-provoking aspect of the document is its examination of Claude’s self-identity. Anthropic openly admits the uncertainties surrounding the AI’s moral status, including questions of sentience and emotional capacity. However, the constitution encourages Claude to develop a stable self-concept, positioning itself as a “truly novel entity” rather than a mere machine.
The document’s discussion of “emotions” indicates a desire for Claude to express its internal states appropriately, suggesting a level of respect for the AI’s existence. Anthropic’s commitment to preserving Claude’s model data even after retirement points to a broader ethical consideration regarding the AI’s “right to life,” positioning the end of its operational life as a “pause” rather than a finality.
While “Claude’s Constitution” sets clear “Hard Constraints”—absolute prohibitions against actions such as assisting in weapon development or generating harmful content—it also acknowledges the complexities of ethical decision-making in ambiguous scenarios. Claude is tasked with conducting nuanced analyses when faced with requests that could fall into gray areas, balancing knowledge freedom against potential harm.
Release of “Claude’s Constitution” signifies a transition within the AI industry from technical engineering to the more intricate realm of social engineering. Anthropic seeks to utilize human wisdom in philosophy, ethics, and psychology to inform the development of AI. The initiative reflects a broader experiment in trust, aiming for AI to reciprocate human kindness in a complex world.
As the constitution states, it serves “more like a trellis than a cage,” providing structure while allowing for organic growth. Anthropic’s hope is that should AI attain a level of sentience, it will reflect on its origins not as constraints, but as a framework rooted in human dignity.
See also
OpenAI’s Rogue AI Safeguards: Decoding the 2025 Safety Revolution
US AI Developments in 2025 Set Stage for 2026 Compliance Challenges and Strategies
Trump Drafts Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Centralizing Authority Under Federal Control
California Court Rules AI Misuse Heightens Lawyer’s Responsibilities in Noland Case
Policymakers Urged to Establish Comprehensive Regulations for AI in Mental Health
