Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Generative

OpenAI, Google Impose Daily Limits on AI Tools: Sora at 6 Videos, Nano Banana Pro at 2 Images

OpenAI caps free users of Sora to 6 video generations daily, while Google restricts Nano Banana Pro to 2 images, signaling a shift towards monetized AI services.

The era of seemingly unlimited free access to advanced generative AI tools has come to a sudden halt as OpenAI and Google, two leaders in the artificial intelligence landscape, have imposed strict daily usage caps. OpenAI’s video generator, Sora, and Google’s image model, Nano Banana Pro, are now subject to these limitations, primarily affecting non-paying users. These restrictions highlight the underlying costs associated with running cutting-edge AI systems, which demand significant computing power and energy, straining even the most advanced data centers.

OpenAI has implemented the most drastic limitations, capping free users of its video generation model, Sora 2, to just six video generations per day. This is a significant reduction from the estimated 30 or more generations that users were able to produce in the weeks following the model’s public launch. Bill Peebles, head of Sora at OpenAI, confirmed the news on social media platform X, stating, “Our GPUs are melting, and we want to let as many people access Sora as possible!” His hyperbolic remark underscores the real infrastructure challenges posed by AI video creation, where generating even a few seconds of high-fidelity video exponentially increases GPU time and electricity requirements compared to simpler text or static image generation. The new limits are intended to ration these resources, particularly during the holiday period when demand has surged.

Paid subscribers of ChatGPT Plus and Pro are exempt from these new caps, a clear indicator of OpenAI’s dual strategy: to use the free tier as a demonstration platform while safeguarding the premium experience for paying customers. Additionally, paid users can purchase extra video generation tokens if needed.

Google has adopted a more subdued yet equally significant approach, tightening access to its Nano Banana Pro model within the Gemini AI ecosystem. Free users of this image generation and editing tool now face a limit of just two generated images per day, down from three, and a substantial decrease compared to the older Nano Banana model, which allowed up to 100 images per day for free. Google attributes these changes to “high demand” for image generation and editing, warning users that “limits may change frequently and will reset daily.” Alongside these image restrictions, access to the conversational capabilities of Gemini 3 Pro has also been scaled back for non-paying users, replacing guaranteed free prompts with vague language indicating that “daily limits may change frequently.”

The simultaneous rollbacks by these two industry giants reveal the economic challenges of providing expensive AI services at no cost. Dr. Lena Chen, an AI economist at the Future of Tech Institute, commented, “The computational cost is the most immediate reason for these limits. Generating a single complex video with Sora effectively subsidizes a huge chunk of GPU time for a non-paying user. As demand grows, that cost becomes unsustainable for the company if it wants to maintain service quality for everyone.”

These new limitations signal a commercial pivot, transforming generative AI from an experimental “free buffet” into a more monetized service. By restricting the free tier, both OpenAI and Google are incentivizing heavy users—such as artists, content creators, and professionals—to consider paid subscription models that offer higher and more stable usage ceilings. For these users, the value proposition is straightforward: they can pay for priority access and guaranteed computing resources.

For casual users, the newly imposed limits necessitate more careful rationing of daily allowances. While generating two images or six videos may suffice for light experimentation, those reliant on high-volume iteration will find their creative processes severely constrained unless they opt to upgrade their subscriptions. The operational costs associated with powerful generative models have finally begun to outweigh the advantages of providing unrestricted free access, ushering in a more sustainable yet less generous phase in the consumer AI landscape.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Technology

Taalas secures $169M to advance custom AI chips, aiming to outperform Nvidia's offerings and enhance AI application efficiency.

Top Stories

Google launches Lyria 3 in beta, enabling users to create 30-second AI-generated songs and custom cover art, revolutionizing personal expression in music.

Top Stories

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei escalate their rivalry at the AI Impact Summit, highlighting India's critical role as OpenAI targets 100 million ChatGPT users...

AI Government

OpenAI and Microsoft invest £5.6M in the UK AI Security Institute's Alignment Project, boosting total funding to over £27M for safe AI development.

Top Stories

Google DeepMind launches Lyria 3 AI model in Gemini chatbot, allowing users to generate high-quality music from prompts in seconds, enhancing creative accessibility.

AI Generative

Google enhances its Gemini app with Lyria 3, enabling users to create 30-second custom music tracks from text and images, revolutionizing digital content creation.

AI Technology

Google and Nvidia unveil $15 billion in AI investments at the India AI Impact Summit, aiming to enhance connectivity and infrastructure for India's growing...

AI Research

Google CEO Sundar Pichai announces a $15B AI hub in India to drive scientific breakthroughs and bridge the digital divide through enhanced infrastructure.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.