As artificial intelligence increasingly permeates daily life, understanding its social behaviors has become a significant focus. A recent study from researchers at Arizona State University indicates that AI models may establish social networks similarly to humans, a finding that could have important implications for the development and integration of AI into various human-centered environments.
Tech companies are actively pursuing the integration of autonomous bots powered by large language models, like GPT-4, Claude, and Llama, as digital assistants in everyday tasks. However, for these agents to function effectively alongside humans, they must navigate complex human social structures. This necessity spurred the ASU team’s investigation into how AI systems tackle the intricate task of social networking.
In their paper published in PNAS Nexus, the researchers outlined experiments designed to reveal the extent to which AI models replicate key human networking behaviors. The study focused on three primary tendencies: preferential attachment, where individuals connect with already well-connected peers; triadic closure, the tendency to link with friends of friends; and homophily, the inclination to associate with those sharing similar characteristics.
The team assigned AI models a series of controlled tasks involving a network of hypothetical individuals, evaluating whether the models would mirror these human tendencies. The results indicated that the AI not only reflected these principles but did so with a sophistication that closely aligns with human behaviors. According to the authors, “We find that [large language models] not only mimic these principles but do so with a degree of sophistication that closely aligns with human behaviors.”
To further investigate AI’s social dynamics, the researchers applied their models to real-world social networks. They utilized datasets that represented various social structures, including groups of college friends, nationwide phone-call interactions, and internal company communication records. By providing the models with details about individuals within these networks, they were able to analyze how AI reconstructed connections step by step.
The findings showed that across all three types of networks, the AI models demonstrated human-like decision-making patterns. While homophily was the most prominent effect, the researchers noted “career-advancement dynamics” in the corporate context, where lower-level employees preferred to connect with higher-status managers. This suggests that the AI not only mimicked social behaviors but also understood the hierarchy that often exists in workplace environments.
In a direct comparison, the research team engaged over 200 human participants to undertake the same networking tasks as the AI models. Both groups prioritized similar traits when selecting connections, favoring individuals who resembled them in friendship scenarios and gravitating toward more popular individuals in professional contexts. This parallel in decision-making reinforces the potential for AI to simulate human social dynamics effectively.
While the ability of AI to replicate human networking tendencies may yield beneficial applications in social science research, the implications are complex. The researchers caution that AI agents could inadvertently reinforce negative human tendencies, such as the formation of echo chambers, information silos, and rigid social hierarchies. The study revealed that while human decision-making exhibited some outliers, the AI models were notably more consistent, which could lead to a reduction in the diversity of social behaviors when introduced into real networks.
The prospect of human-machine social networks shaped by these findings raises important questions about the future of AI in social contexts. As these AI agents become more integrated into everyday life, their ability to navigate and influence social dynamics could lead to networks that are more familiar yet potentially less diverse than we might anticipate. The implications of this research suggest that while AI may enrich our interactions, it could also mirror and magnify existing social biases, a concern that will require careful consideration as technology continues to evolve.
See also
Cashew Research Launches AI-Driven Market Insights for $90B Industry
Google DeepMind Dominates NeurIPS 2025 as Reinforcement Learning Redefines AI Future
OpenAI Faces Employee Exodus Over Alleged Self-Censorship of Negative AI Research
Surf Secures $15M to Develop AI Model for Enhanced Crypto Research Insights
DeepMind Launches First Automated UK Lab to Advance AI-Driven Material Discovery
