Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Regulation

Trump Signs Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Favoring Tech Giants

Trump’s executive order blocks states from enacting AI regulations, favoring tech giants like Google and OpenAI, amid over 1,000 proposed state bills.

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order designed to prevent states from implementing their own artificial intelligence (AI) regulations, a move that aims to establish federal oversight in a rapidly evolving sector. “We want to have one central source of approval,” Trump stated during a press briefing in the Oval Office on Thursday.

The order equips the Trump administration with the necessary tools to counter what White House AI adviser David Sacks characterized as “onerous” state regulations. However, Sacks clarified that the federal government would not interfere with AI regulations concerning children’s safety, highlighting the administration’s intent to maintain some level of oversight.

This decision marks a significant victory for large technology companies, which have long advocated for uniform AI legislation across the United States. Industry leaders argue that varying state-level regulations could stifle innovation and impede the US’s competitive edge against countries like China, as firms invest heavily in AI technology.

Despite the potential advantages, the executive order has faced criticism. At present, there are no national laws governing AI in the US, yet over 1,000 separate bills have been proposed in various states, according to the White House. This year alone, 38 states, including California—home to many leading technology firms—have enacted nearly 100 AI regulations, as reported by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The regulations introduced vary considerably. For example, California has mandated that platforms remind users when they are engaging with a chatbot, a measure aimed at protecting younger audiences from potential risks. Additionally, the state has passed a bill requiring major AI developers to detail their strategies for mitigating catastrophic risks associated with their technologies.

In North Dakota, a newly enacted law prohibits the use of AI-powered robots for stalking or harassment. Arkansas has introduced measures to ensure AI-generated content respects intellectual property rights, while Oregon has ruled that AI systems cannot utilize licensed medical titles, such as “registered nurse.”

Critics contend that Trump’s executive order undermines the essential role of state regulations in the absence of robust federal guidelines. Julie Scelfo, representing the advocacy group Mothers Against Media Addiction, remarked, “Stripping states from enacting their own AI safeguards undermines states’ basic rights to establish sufficient guardrails to protect their residents.”

California’s Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat and vocal opponent of the president, accused Trump of prioritizing the interests of tech allies with this executive order. “Today, President Trump continued his ongoing grift in the White House, attempting to enrich himself and his associates, with a new executive order seeking to preempt state laws protecting Americans from unregulated AI technology,” he stated.

While major AI firms such as OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Anthropic did not provide immediate comments regarding the order, the move garnered support from tech advocacy group NetChoice. Its director of policy, Patrick Hedger, expressed optimism about collaborating with the White House and Congress to establish nationwide standards and a clear regulatory framework for innovators.

Michael Goodyear, an associate professor at New York Law School, emphasized the concerns within the AI industry regarding compliance with a fragmented set of state rules, which may conflict with one another. “It would be better to have one federal law than a bunch of conflicting state laws,” he noted, while also cautioning that this assumes a quality federal law is forthcoming.

The introduction of this executive order highlights the ongoing tension between state and federal authority in the realm of technology regulation. As AI continues to evolve rapidly, the balance between fostering innovation and ensuring public safety remains a critical issue for lawmakers, industry stakeholders, and advocacy groups alike.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Cybersecurity

ZeroEyes expands its AI platform to include knife detection and non-invasive suspect tracking, enhancing public safety and response times in critical situations.

AI Cybersecurity

ZeroEyes expands its AI security platform to include knife detection and suspect tracking, enhancing threat response capabilities for enterprises and MSPs.

AI Finance

U.S. layoffs surged to 60,620 in March as companies, led by Dell Technologies, pivot budgets to AI, prompting 15,341 job cuts directly tied to...

AI Technology

US and Israeli forces executed 1,000 AI-targeted strikes in 24 hours, doubling Iraq War's scale, raising urgent accountability and ethical concerns.

AI Regulation

California Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order mandates new AI certification standards for state contracts, directly challenging the Trump administration's federal AI policy.

AI Government

Microsoft announces a $1 billion investment in Thailand to enhance AI infrastructure and cloud capabilities, aiming to capture growth in Southeast Asia.

AI Research

Global Security Analytics Market projected to soar from $16.22 billion in 2025 to $78.92 billion by 2035, driven by rising cyber threats and zero-trust...

Top Stories

Google unveils its AI Inbox for Gmail at $250/month, revolutionizing email management by prioritizing crucial messages and tasks for enhanced productivity.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.