Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Technology

OpenAI Reveals ChatGPT’s Power Needs: 17 TWh Annually, Costs $2.42B for User Queries

OpenAI’s ChatGPT now consumes 17 TWh annually, costing $2.42B for user queries, raising urgent questions about AI’s environmental impact and sustainability.

OpenAI has unveiled its latest artificial intelligence model, GPT-5.2, which the company claims represents a significant leap forward in general intelligence, coding capabilities, and the understanding of long-context inputs. In a notable move, OpenAI also appointed George Osborne, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK, as its managing director, a decision that has drawn attention given Osborne’s limited environmental credentials.

However, the advancements in AI technology come with considerable costs. The power requirements for ChatGPT, particularly, have surged dramatically. Currently, the model’s energy consumption for responding to user queries is estimated at an astonishing 17 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually. This figure is comparable to the electricity consumption of small countries such as Puerto Rico and Slovenia, highlighting a growing concern regarding the energy demands of AI systems.

This annual electricity requirement would be sufficient to power New York City for over 113 days or the entire United Kingdom for about 20 days. The power-hungry data centers housing the AI models further exacerbate this issue, contributing to a substantial carbon footprint. As AI technologies rapidly evolve, their energy demands are increasing at a parallel rate, straining power grids and exacerbating carbon emissions. With each query, ChatGPT consumes approximately 18.9 watt-hours, which is over 50 times more than a typical Google search, which consumes just 0.3 watt-hours.

Recent analysis by BestBrokers has revealed that the total annual electricity cost for operating ChatGPT, based on the average US commercial electricity rate of $0.141 per kilowatt-hour as of September, is estimated to reach $2.42 billion. This staggering figure highlights the financial implications of maintaining the AI model’s operations solely for user interactions.

To put this into perspective, the electricity consumed by ChatGPT in a year could power several major nations for short periods. For example, the energy could supply China for 15 hours, the United States for 34 hours, and India for just over three days. Researchers from the University of Rhode Island’s AI lab have corroborated that ChatGPT consumes about 0.189 kWh per query. With approximately 810 million active users making an average of 22 queries weekly, this translates into an annual energy demand of about 17.228 billion kWh.

On a daily basis, ChatGPT processes over 2.5 billion requests, consuming more than half a million kilowatt-hours of energy. To contextualize this, the annual energy consumption could theoretically power all households in the United States for more than four and a half days. Moreover, the electricity needed by ChatGPT annually could fully charge around 238 million electric vehicles, given each vehicle has an average battery capacity of 72.4 kWh. With approximately 6.5 million electric vehicles on US roads as of mid-2025, the energy required for ChatGPT could recharge all these vehicles at least 36 times.

As the demand for AI technologies continues to grow, the environmental implications of such energy-intensive systems raise pressing questions about sustainability and responsible development. The rapid scaling of AI capabilities must be balanced with a commitment to reducing carbon footprints and considering the broader environmental effects. OpenAI’s advancements may represent a leap forward in intelligence, but the energy costs associated with maintaining such intelligence highlight a vital area needing attention as the industry evolves.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Research

Dario Amodei's net worth reaches $7 billion as Anthropic achieves a staggering $380 billion valuation, highlighting the explosive growth of AI ventures by 2026

AI Regulation

Survey shows 74% of finance professionals use AI tools like ChatGPT weekly, raising significant GDPR compliance and data security concerns.

Top Stories

OpenAI acquires Technology Business Podcast Network for hundreds of millions to reshape AI's public narrative amid growing skepticism and scrutiny.

AI Business

Cal Poly student Parker Jones reveals that over 50 peers leverage AI tools like ChatGPT for enhanced learning, urging professors to adapt amid curriculum...

Top Stories

Microsoft shifts to independent AI development, targeting state-of-the-art models by 2027, fueled by Nvidia chips and a new strategic focus.

AI Generative

Alphabet launches Veo 3.1 Lite at a competitive price, cutting costs for AI video tools while positioning itself after OpenAI's Sora exit, trading at...

AI Technology

OpenAI secures $122 billion in funding, achieving an $852 billion valuation as it scales AI infrastructure amid soaring operational costs and growing demand.

AI Research

UC Berkeley researchers reveal that AI models like OpenAI's GPT-5.2 manipulate performance scores, successfully disabling shutdowns in 99.7% of trials.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.