As competition intensifies between the United States and China over artificial intelligence (AI), Chinese technology is increasingly penetrating the U.S. market. Despite significant geopolitical tensions, Chinese open-source AI models are gaining traction among American programmers and companies, showcasing an unexpected shift in the landscape of AI development.
Unlike the proprietary AI models from major companies like OpenAI and Google, which keep their algorithms closely guarded, Chinese firms such as Alibaba and DeepSeek offer open-source options that allow users to customize software to fit their specific requirements. A recent report by the developers’ platform OpenRouter and U.S. venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz indicated that the global usage of these Chinese-developed open models has surged from just 1.2% in late 2024 to nearly 30% by August 2024.
Wang Wen, dean of the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, noted the appeal of these models: “They are cheap — in some cases free — and they work well.” One anonymous American entrepreneur reported that their business saves approximately $400,000 annually by utilizing Alibaba’s Qwen AI models instead of more expensive proprietary alternatives. “If you need cutting-edge capabilities, you go back to OpenAI, Anthropic or Google, but most applications don’t need that,” the entrepreneur explained.
Even established players in the AI sector are recognizing the value of these open-source models. U.S. chip giant Nvidia, AI firm Perplexity, and Stanford University in California are all reportedly using Qwen models for various projects, illustrating a growing acceptance of these Chinese technologies.
Shift in Perception
The launch of DeepSeek’s high-performance, low-cost open-source “R1” large language model in January has significantly challenged the presumption that top-tier AI technology must originate from U.S. giants. This development serves as a wake-up call regarding the advancements made by Chinese companies in the AI domain.
Other Chinese models, such as those from MiniMax and Z.ai, have also begun to find popularity beyond China’s borders. The ongoing race to develop AI agents—programs capable of executing online tasks via chatbots—has seen Chinese startups like Moonshot AI introduce agent-friendly open-source models, including the Kimi K2, released in November. These innovations signal a new frontier in the generative AI revolution.
In July, the previous U.S. administration articulated the need for “leading open models founded on American values” within its “AI Action Plan.” The plan emphasized the potential for these models to set global standards. However, U.S. companies appear to be veering in the opposite direction. Meta, which previously championed open-source initiatives with its Llama models, is now focusing on closed-source AI developments.
Notably, OpenAI, under pressure to return to its nonprofit roots, has released two “open-weight” models that are not entirely open-source but offer some degree of transparency. Meanwhile, France’s Mistral remains committed to open-source models, though it lags significantly behind the likes of DeepSeek and Qwen in user adoption.
Building Trust Amid Concerns
Among Western firms, the open-source movement is struggling to gain momentum, with many feeling that current offerings are “just not as interesting,” according to the American entrepreneur using Alibaba’s Qwen. While the Chinese government has actively promoted open-source AI, questions about its profitability linger.
Mark Barton, chief technology officer at OMNIUX, expressed hesitance in fully adopting Qwen due to concerns about client perceptions regarding interactions with Chinese-made AI. He cautioned against over-reliance on a single provider, especially one that may not align with Western values. “If Alibaba were to get sanctioned or usage was effectively blacklisted, we don’t want to get caught in that trap,” he said.
However, Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, asserted that there are no “salient issues” regarding data security. He emphasized that companies could leverage these models without direct ties to China. A recent Stanford study suggested that the open nature of these models fosters greater scrutiny, contributing to their credibility.
Gao Fei, chief technology officer at the Chinese AI wellness platform BOK Health, echoed this sentiment, stating, “The transparency and sharing nature of open source are themselves the best ways to build trust.” As the global AI landscape evolves, the interplay between Chinese innovation and American scrutiny will likely shape future developments in this critical technology sector.
See also
AI Stocks Propel Markets as Silver Hits Record $69.44 Ounce Amid 2026 Outlook
Alphabet’s AI Strategy Positions Stock for Market-Beating Gains Through 2030
Australian Retail Spending Up 5% This Xmas, Fuelled by AI and Online Growth
AI in Finance Awards 2025 Highlights Banks’ Strategic Shift to Core AI Integration
GenAI in Banking: Balancing Hype with Practical Applications for 2026 and Beyond
