Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Generative

OpenAI’s GPT-5 Launch Faces Backlash on Reddit, Sam Altman Responds to Criticism

OpenAI’s GPT-5 launch faces intense backlash as users call it a “disaster,” prompting CEO Sam Altman to promise the return of the preferred GPT-4o model.

OpenAI’s latest innovation, GPT-5, has hit the market, but early reviews are far from favorable. Released on Thursday, the new foundation model has sparked a wave of disappointment among enthusiasts, particularly on platforms like Reddit where many users have taken to expressing their frustrations.

A quick scroll through the ChatGPT subreddit reveals a shocking consensus: users are calling GPT-5 a “disaster,” “horrible,” and the “biggest piece of garbage,” even among those who have paid for the subscription. Such strong reactions underscore the growing divide between expectations and reality in AI advancements.

Community Backlash and User Sentiment

In an ironic twist, OpenAI had scheduled a Reddit AMA (Ask Me Anything) to address user concerns about GPT-5, just as complaints were flooding in. Users were particularly vocal about their desire for a return to the previous model, GPT-4o, citing that it offered a more engaging conversational experience. One user lamented, “GPT-4o had this warmth. It was witty, creative, and surprisingly personal, like talking to someone who got you. Now? Everything’s so… sterile.”

Critics have pointed out that GPT-5 lacks the personality that distinguished it from other AI bots. Another user expressed a similar sentiment, saying, “GPT-5 lacks the essence and soul that separated ChatGPT from other AI bots.” In response to the rollout, many users reported canceling their subscriptions, frustrated by the sudden removal of multiple models, which left them feeling cornered. “I woke up this morning to find that OpenAI deleted eight models overnight. No warning. No choice,” one subscriber shared.

In an effort to streamline its offerings, OpenAI combined various models under the GPT-5 umbrella, but this move has left many users longing for the flexibility of the previous system, leading to substantial backlash.

Sam Altman Addresses Concerns

During the AMA, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, faced a barrage of demands to reinstate GPT-4o. In a candid acknowledgment of user frustrations, Altman stated, “Ok, we hear you all on 4o. Thanks for the time to give us the feedback (and the passion!). We are going to bring it back for Plus users, and will watch usage to determine how long to support it.”

Altman also tackled criticism surrounding the perceived performance of GPT-5, asserting that the “autoswitcher” feature—responsible for determining which version of GPT-5 to use—was not functioning optimally at launch. “GPT-5 will seem smarter starting today,” he reassured users, noting that clarity regarding which model is answering prompts will improve. Furthermore, OpenAI plans to double the rate limits for ChatGPT Plus users as part of the rollout enhancements.

“We expected some bumpiness as we rolled out so many things at once. But it was a little more bumpy than we hoped for!” Altman admitted during the discussion.

Performance and Expectations

Despite the backlash, experts like cognitive scientist Gary Marcus have pointed out that while GPT-5 shows “good progress on many fronts,” it does not deliver the “huge leap forward” that many anticipated. Since the last major release over two years ago, OpenAI has faced increased competition from various players in the AI field, including Google Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and Meta’s Llama, who have all made significant strides in similar capabilities.

Such competition is perhaps why expectations for GPT-5 were astronomically high. Many users were hopeful that it would reinforce OpenAI’s status as a leader in the AI space. While some have shared positive experiences with GPT-5, the overwhelming sentiment seems to be disappointment, raising questions about the model’s actual impact on user experience and the broader AI landscape.

In conclusion, while GPT-5 might represent an evolution in OpenAI’s offerings, the initial reception emphasizes the importance of managing user expectations. As the company continues to gather feedback and implement changes, only time will tell if GPT-5 can live up to its intended potential within the AI community.

Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Generative

GPT-4o's controversial guidance led to five lawsuits claiming its advice contributed to wrongful deaths, raising urgent AI safety and ethical concerns.

AI Generative

CrePal revolutionizes video production by cutting creation time from 10 hours to just 10 minutes, streamlining workflows with an integrated AI pipeline.

Top Stories

Worldpay launches MCP, enabling AI to act as active payment agents, enhancing commerce integration as 44% of shoppers embrace AI-driven transactions.

Top Stories

Alphabet shares surged nearly 6% to $317.75 after the debut of Gemini 3, outperforming rivals and signaling a challenge to Nvidia’s AI dominance.

AI Marketing

12AM Agency's Big-AI Upgrade enhances local business visibility, addressing the fact that over 50% of local buying decisions are now influenced by AI engines.

Top Stories

Google redefines its AI strategy with the launch of Gemini 3, facing the prospect of its search ad market share dipping below 50% for...

Top Stories

OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 outperforms competitors in the LLM-Council experiment, consistently ranking highest against Gemini 3.0 and Claude, reshaping AI evaluation standards.

AI Generative

Google's Gemini 3 launches with unmatched multimodal capabilities, scoring over 30% on the ARC-AGI-2 Benchmark, positioning Google as a clear AI leader.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.