Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

ADLM Calls for Federal Action to Ensure Equitable AI in Laboratory Medicine

ADLM urges Congress to modernize lab regulations to ensure AI in diagnostics is equitable, addressing risks of bias for marginalized patient demographics.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — The Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM) has issued a position statement emphasizing the potential risks associated with the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in laboratory medicine. Released today, the statement focuses particularly on the implications for historically marginalized patient demographics. To address these risks and harness the benefits of AI in healthcare, ADLM calls for Congress and federal agencies to modernize existing laboratory regulations and implement policies ensuring that AI clinical systems are both safe and effective.

As laboratory medicine is crucial for accurate diagnoses and patient care, AI’s transformative potential could enhance diagnostic precision, streamline laboratory workflows, and facilitate data-driven clinical decision-making. However, the accuracy of AI models is contingent on the quality and diversity of the data upon which they are trained. There are significant concerns that AI models may replicate societal biases, leading to underestimations of risk or misdiagnoses in marginalized populations. This challenge arises from the reliance on historical datasets that often lack representation of various racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups.

To mitigate bias within laboratory AI and ensure effective monitoring of technology that influences test interpretations and treatment decisions, ADLM makes several recommendations to the federal government. The association urges Congress to collaborate with federal agencies to update existing laboratory laws, such as the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), to specifically include AI systems. Furthermore, it recommends that federal health agencies work alongside professional societies to develop consensus guidelines for the validation and verification of AI tools in laboratory settings. Additionally, there is a call for federal agencies to bolster initiatives that harmonize laboratory test results and standardize data reporting.

ADLM also encourages AI developers to work in tandem with regulators and healthcare organizations to foster data diversity and reduce bias within laboratory AI applications. Ensuring that clinical laboratories have access to necessary data and technical resources is vital for independent verification and validation of algorithm performance.

“Clinical laboratories are uniquely positioned to help develop and assess the integration of AI health tools into testing workflows and, most importantly, how they influence patient test results and health outcomes,” stated ADLM President Dr. Paul J. Jannetto. He emphasized the necessity for federal government to leverage laboratory medicine professionals’ expertise to create regulations that promote innovation while ensuring transparent and consistent performance monitoring for this groundbreaking technology.

The ADLM, dedicated to advancing health through laboratory medicine, comprises over 70,000 clinical laboratory professionals, physicians, research scientists, and industry leaders across 110 countries. This diverse community spans various subdisciplines, including clinical chemistry, molecular diagnostics, and data science. Since its establishment in 1948, ADLM has been at the forefront of laboratory medicine, advocating for scientific collaboration, knowledge sharing, and the creation of innovative solutions that enhance health outcomes. For more information about ADLM, visit www.myadlm.org.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

Over 1,500 AI bills are proposed in the U.S. as lawmakers strive to prevent market dominance akin to telecom consolidation post-1996, emphasizing competitive innovation.

Top Stories

Growing populist backlash against AI intensifies as 60% of Americans distrust the technology, demanding regulation and accountability amid rising utility costs.

AI Education

IXL Learning secures 13 awards in 2025, reinforcing its status as the leading EdTech platform with innovative personalized learning solutions for 17 million students.

AI Finance

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns that AI poses significant risks to financial stability, prompting enhanced regulatory oversight in 2025 financial markets.

AI Regulation

FTC shifts regulatory focus away from AI, indicating no new rules are forthcoming, as it prioritizes children's privacy protections and innovation under Trump’s AI...

AI Regulation

Black Duck's BSIMM16 reveals a 10% rise in application security innovations as organizations confront AI risks, underscoring AI's pivotal role in security priorities.

Top Stories

Bitcoin drops to its lowest point since late 2024 amid fears of AI disruption and rising geopolitical tensions, while US stocks face significant declines.

Top Stories

AI adoption drives 55,000 layoffs in 2025 across major firms like Pinterest and Dow, reshaping workforce dynamics as companies prioritize efficiency.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.