Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

Retraining Programs Gain Support as 87% Favor Skills Training Over AI Job Loss Solutions

A recent study reveals 87% of Americans and Canadians support workforce retraining initiatives to combat job losses from AI adoption, favoring skills training over other solutions.

As concerns surrounding the potential job losses due to artificial intelligence (AI) intensify, a promising solution is gaining traction among both Americans and Canadians: equipping the workforce with the necessary skills to navigate the evolving job landscape. A recent multiyear study, featured in Foreign Affairs, indicates widespread support for government-led retraining and reskilling initiatives to mitigate AI-related job displacement.

The study, conducted by Beatrice Magistro, an assistant professor of AI governance at Northeastern University, along with her colleagues, involved surveying 6,000 adults in the U.S. and Canada. Participants were presented with varying economic disruption scenarios—either stemming from AI adoption or offshoring—and asked to evaluate a range of policy responses. The findings reveal a clear preference for workforce retraining across political affiliations, with this approach significantly outpacing other suggested remedies.

“We aimed to explore public attitudes toward generative AI and its political ramifications,” Magistro stated. The results showed that regardless of political alignment, respondents from both nations favored retraining as the most effective policy response. Following that, enhanced regulatory oversight and expanded safety nets also garnered considerable support.

The Case for Worker Retraining

Support for retraining programs is on the rise, as evidence suggests they can enhance earnings for displaced workers venturing into new career paths. These programs encompass a broad spectrum of offerings, from self-guided learning and free online resources to formal online degree programs and employer-sponsored boot camps.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Alicia Modestino, an associate professor of public policy and urban affairs at Northeastern, emphasized the urgency of continuous skill adaptation in today’s rapidly changing job market. “The necessity to remain relevant in the labor market has always hinged on reskilling, and AI accelerates this need even further compared to prior technological disruptions, such as the advent of personal computers or the internet,” she noted. She also highlighted the role of apprenticeships, co-ops, and other subsidized educational opportunities in nurturing future talent pipelines.

However, the study highlights that not all sectors are equally susceptible to AI-driven job losses. Fields such as healthcare, skilled trades, management, and emergency services are less likely to face immediate threats from automation compared to sectors like legal services and media.

Public Sentiment on AI

The survey further categorized respondents into two distinct groups based on their attitudes toward AI: “complementers” and “substituters.” Complementers view AI as a tool that can enhance human capabilities, foster new job creation, and lead to improved economic conditions, while substituters hold a more pessimistic outlook, fearing AI will replace human workers and exacerbate economic challenges.

“Interestingly, these two groups express divergent policy preferences,” Magistro explained. Complementers are generally inclined to support reskilling initiatives, educational programs, or social insurance, whereas substituters tend to advocate for immigration restrictions and measures like robot taxes, which penalize businesses that replace human labor.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

While complementers typically align with liberal ideologies, substituters skew conservative. Nevertheless, Magistro noted that public attitudes toward AI remain fluid, suggesting potential shifts as discussions evolve and new information emerges.

The debate surrounding AI is not confined to partisan lines. Recent research from the Civic Health and Institutions Project (CHIP50) indicates that views on AI regulation diverge from traditional political divides, reflecting a broad spectrum of concerns regarding workplace disruption.

As the administration seeks to amplify investments in AI technology, the role of public sentiment in shaping policy and regulatory frameworks becomes increasingly pivotal. With the stakes so high, understanding and addressing these attitudes may prove essential as we move into an AI-enhanced future.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Technology

Cars.com reveals 97% of consumers using AI like Carson™ say it influences their car purchase decisions, marking a pivotal shift in auto retail.

AI Government

Accenture's study reveals 62% of government workers see AI as a tool to reduce workloads, but only 20% trust its reliability for public services

AI Business

Bank of America highlights wage struggles as AI spending drives economic growth.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.