Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

UK Government Calls Musk’s Grok AI Image Edit Policy “Insulting” to Abuse Victims

UK government condemns X’s Grok AI policy as “insulting” to abuse victims, urging an investigation into the monetization of harmful image-editing tools.

The UK government has condemned recent actions by Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, after it was revealed that access to the Grok AI image-editing tool would be restricted to paying subscribers. This move has been labeled “insulting” to victims of misogyny and sexual violence, raising concerns about the implications of monetizing features that have been misused to create unlawful images.

On Friday, a spokesperson for Downing Street criticized X’s decision, arguing that it effectively turns a tool capable of generating harmful imagery into a “premium service.” This reaction comes in the wake of significant backlash against Grok, which had previously been used to digitally undress individuals without their consent, a practice that has left many feeling “humiliated” and “dehumanized.”

Although Grok will only perform image alterations for subscribers, concerns remain about its accessibility through other functions on the platform. Users can still utilize X’s built-in “edit image” feature or access Grok via its separate app and website, raising questions about the adequacy of X’s response to the outcry surrounding its misuse.

The backlash has not only been vocalized by government officials but also by advocacy groups and experts. Professor Clare McGlynn, an authority on the legal regulation of online abuse, condemned Musk’s approach as an evasion of responsibility. “Instead of taking the responsible steps to ensure Grok could not be used for abusive purposes, it has withdrawn access for the vast majority of users,” she stated. Meanwhile, Hannah Swirsky from the Internet Watch Foundation remarked that limiting access does not rectify the harm already caused, arguing that such capabilities should never have existed in the first place.

Grok, which allows users to tag the AI in posts or replies to request specific responses, has been leveraged for inappropriate requests. Reports indicate that it has been used to alter images of women to portray them in minimal clothing, an act that many have deemed abusive. As of Friday morning, Grok informed users that “image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers,” prompting a mixed response from the public and experts alike.

Dr. Daisy Dixon, a lecturer at Cardiff University and a female user of the platform, welcomed the change but suggested it feels inadequate. “Grok needs to be totally redesigned and have built-in ethical guardrails to prevent this from ever happening again,” she emphasized. Calls for more comprehensive changes have been echoed by charities fighting gender-based violence, with Emma Pickering from Refuge asserting that the monetization of a tool that facilitates abuse is “absolutely unacceptable.”

In light of these developments, the Liberal Democrats have urged that access to X be temporarily restricted in the UK until a thorough investigation is conducted. They argue that no other platform would be allowed to operate unimpeded while facilitating the mass generation of abusive content. Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, has said it has made “urgent” contact with X to assess compliance with UK laws regarding the content generated using Grok.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously denounced the images generated by Grok as “disgraceful” and “disgusting.” The government has expressed full support for Ofcom in taking all necessary actions, including a potential ban on X in the UK. Concurrently, Conservative officials have reiterated their disapproval of deepfake imagery, labeling it “absolutely abhorrent.”

As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the broader implications of this incident highlight the urgent need for tech companies to implement robust safeguards against misuse of AI tools. While limiting access to Grok may reduce its use for harmful purposes, the controversy underscores the risks associated with AI technologies that can easily be exploited. The challenge for companies like X is not just to respond to user concerns but to proactively design systems that prioritize user safety and ethical standards.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Generative

X restricts its Grok image generation feature to paid subscribers globally, amid government scrutiny over non-consensual and obscene content violations.

Top Stories

Elon Musk's Grok chatbot restricts deepfake sexual image creation for non-paying users amid global backlash and regulatory scrutiny following widespread abuse.

Top Stories

Authorities in France, India, and Malaysia investigate Grok after 53% of over 20,000 generated images featured women in explicit content, raising global concerns.

Top Stories

Ex-Grok executive Robert Hayes retains a rare waiver for his 22,100 xAI shares amid ongoing scrutiny of the controversial Grok chatbot's outputs.

AI Generative

Grok restricts image generation features to paying subscribers amid global backlash over its role in creating unlawful deepfakes, prompting regulatory scrutiny.

AI Government

UK government delays criminalizing non-consensual deepfakes as Elon Musk's Grok AI generates over 100 sexualized images of one woman, sparking outrage.

AI Government

Irish ministers urgently engage X executives over the alarming rise of deepfake images exploiting children, calling for immediate regulatory measures against AI tool Grok.

AI Generative

Grok AI faces UK regulator scrutiny as Ofcom investigates explicit deepfakes of minors amid concerns of user misuse and inadequate safeguards.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.