Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Regulation

US Congress Calls for Stricter AI Workplace Regulations Amid Rising Concerns on Worker Rights

US lawmakers demand enhanced transparency and oversight in AI workplace regulations, noting risks like privacy invasion and bias in employee monitoring systems.

Washington, Feb 4 (IANS) — Top US lawmakers have expressed concerns regarding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in workplaces, emphasizing the need for transparency and human oversight as businesses expand their use of these technologies. During a House hearing titled “Building an AI-Ready America: Adopting AI at Work” on Tuesday, legislators questioned whether existing labor laws and data systems are sufficient to keep pace with the rapid deployment of AI tools.

Congressman Rick W. Allen, the chairman of the panel, noted that AI “is no longer science fiction” and is actively transforming various industries. He underscored the necessity for Congress to protect workers while facilitating innovation and growth. Allen stressed that policymakers require better data to understand how AI is affecting work dynamics, asserting that federal agencies must track these changes to inform sound policy decisions.

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier, the leading Democrat on the panel, highlighted the tangible risks associated with AI, citing instances where employers utilize AI to monitor employee activities and suppress organizing efforts. He referred to tools capable of tracking bathroom breaks and screen activity, warning that such practices jeopardize worker privacy. The discussion underscored the potential for AI to exacerbate existing inequalities in the workplace.

Bradford Kelley, a labor and employment attorney, urged caution regarding the haste to implement new regulations. He cautioned that poorly constructed laws could stifle innovation and undermine US competitiveness, claiming that most abuses are already covered under existing legislation. Moreover, Kelley pointed out the confusion arising from conflicting state laws.

Labor economist Revana Sharfuddin raised a critical point regarding the current data landscape, stating that federal statistics primarily count jobs rather than the specific tasks being automated. She explained that while AI often enhances parts of a job, it does not necessarily eliminate the entire role. “The job still exists,” she said, “but the work has changed,” advocating for more relevant surveys to effectively assess how workers engage with AI technologies.

Tanya Goldman, a former worker protection official, discussed the immediate harm being caused by AI-driven systems that influence wages, schedules, and performance evaluations. She warned that these algorithms can perpetuate bias and impose unsafe work speeds, emphasizing the detrimental impact of constant surveillance on employee rights. Goldman called for enhanced enforcement of existing laws and the introduction of new safeguards tailored to AI, including requirements for disclosure, human oversight on critical decisions, and bias testing. She also suggested that states should have the autonomy to implement stricter regulations.

David Walton, a management-side attorney, noted the surge in AI applications across hiring, safety, and compliance sectors. He mentioned that many employers are establishing internal controls, such as bias testing and ensuring human involvement in significant decisions, which can both protect workers and enhance organizational efficiency. Walton highlighted the importance of clear communication with employees about AI systems, asserting that without their support, workers may seek ways to circumvent these technologies. Early feedback and involvement from employees are crucial, he added.

Democrats at the hearing raised concerns over the lack of resources within enforcement agencies, arguing that these bodies require additional staff and technical expertise to effectively evaluate complex AI systems. As the hearing concluded, there was a notable consensus among lawmakers on the necessity for improved data collection. Allen reiterated that policy must be guided by evidence to benefit both workers and employers.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Regulation

Trump administration launches a national AI framework to enhance child safety, drive economic growth, and ensure U.S. tech leadership amid global competition.

AI Education

Trump unveils a national AI framework to centralize regulations and boost innovation, aiming to secure economic competitiveness and national security through Congress-led reforms.

AI Regulation

White House urges Congress to establish a federal AI regulation framework to prevent state laws from hindering innovation, amid rising tensions over data privacy...

AI Cybersecurity

SEC.co partners with Automatic.co to launch an AI-driven security automation platform that enhances threat response efficiency and reduces manual workloads by 50%

AI Government

U.S. Senators Budd and Kim introduce the bipartisan Artificial Intelligence Ready Data Act to enhance federal data access for AI, backed by major firms...

AI Regulation

Georgia's SB 540 chatbot safety bill mandates AI disclosure and protects minors, gaining traction as state legislatures nationwide push for critical AI regulations.

AI Cybersecurity

The Foundation for American Innovation is hiring a Research Fellow in cybersecurity and AI policy, offering a salary up to $130K and a comprehensive...

Top Stories

Meta engineer Saurabh Khandelwal shares his résumé strategy that emphasizes a cohesive narrative, leveraging startup and Big Tech experiences to excel in AI roles.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.