Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Regulation

Majority of Congressional Aides Support Federal-State Hybrid for AI Regulation, Survey Reveals

A CNCT Capitol Pulse survey reveals 57% of congressional aides support a hybrid federal-state approach to AI regulation, reflecting a shift against federal preemption.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 3, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — A recent survey conducted by CNCT Capitol Pulse indicates that a significant majority of congressional aides advocate for a decentralized approach to oversight of artificial intelligence (AI). The findings reveal that 57 percent of House and Senate staffers prefer a “reasonable combination” of federal and state regulations for AI, rather than a single overarching federal mandate.

The survey results provide an insightful look into the perspectives of the approximately 12,000 aides working on Capitol Hill. With an average age of 27, these staffers represent a demographic whose views often hint at future legislative directions. This preference for a mix of regulatory frameworks comes at a pivotal moment, as the White House and certain congressional leaders have expressed support for federal preemption, a move that would prevent individual states from implementing their own AI regulations.

The debate over federal preemption has emerged as a contentious issue within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and other technology-focused legislation. Proponents of a unified federal framework argue that a “patchwork” of state laws would hinder innovation and lead to compliance challenges for American tech companies. However, the CNCT survey suggests that those involved in drafting these bills are increasingly cautious about limiting state authority to address local concerns.

This inclination towards shared regulatory responsibility reflects a broader skepticism among aides regarding centralized control over emerging technologies. Notably, this sentiment is shared across party lines; Republican aides, who were previously identified as more frequent users of AI tools in their work, show a strong interest in preserving state-level jurisdictional rights, a stance consistent with traditional federalist principles.

The survey also highlights a significant disconnect between public sentiment and executive-level policy. Recent polling from organizations such as the Institute for Family Studies indicates that up to 75 percent of Americans oppose federal preemption of state AI regulations. The alignment of congressional aides with this public opinion suggests that efforts to centralize AI oversight may encounter unexpected challenges during the committee markup process.

In addition to regulatory preferences, the HillFaith report provides context by examining the daily experiences of Hill staffers. Previous data from CNCT has shown that over half of congressional aides utilize AI “regularly” or “sometimes” in their professional roles. Interestingly, senior GOP policy aides have emerged as some of the most frequent adopters of AI technology, using it for tasks such as drafting, research, and data analysis. This high level of engagement with AI tools likely informs their cautious stance toward rigid federal frameworks that may become outdated as technology evolves.

The survey also addressed broader ethical concerns related to AI. Staffers from both political parties expressed apprehensions regarding “black-box” algorithms and the potential for bias, reinforcing their desire for multiple layers of regulatory safeguards. As Congress continues to host AI “Insight Forums” and committee hearings, the preference for a hybrid federal-state regulatory approach is expected to remain a central topic for legislative directors and chiefs of staff.

About HillFaith

HillFaith is a non-partisan outreach ministry and news resource dedicated to serving the more than 12,000 congressional aides working on Capitol Hill. Founded by veteran investigative journalist Mark Tapscott, HillFaith provides a unique blend of news, information, and spiritual support aimed at the high-pressure environment of the legislative branch. Its mission is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with staffers through fact-driven apologetics and mentorship, aiding them in navigating the complex intersection of faith, public policy, and career development. Through its “For Hill Aides Only” (FHAO) programs, HillFaith fosters a community of integrity and excellence among young professionals shaping the future of American law.

Media Contact:
Mark Tapscott
301-275-6645
[email protected]

SOURCE HillFaith

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Regulation

Connecticut lawmakers passed Senate Bill 5, advancing comprehensive AI regulations to Governor Lamont, aiming to protect residents and foster innovation.

AI Regulation

White House intervenes to halt Anthropic's expansion of AI model Mythos, citing national security risks and lack of formal regulations in AI governance

AI Regulation

US designates Anthropic as a supply chain risk, prohibiting federal use of its AI, while the NSA actively employs its Mythos model for cybersecurity.

AI Regulation

Senate Judiciary Committee votes on the GUARD Act, imposing $100K penalties on AI firms like Anthropic for failing to protect minors from harmful chatbots.

AI Regulation

Trump administration seeks federal AI regulation to preempt state laws, proposing a national standard as states introduce 1,200 AI bills this year.

AI Technology

US government escalates actions against China's industrial-scale AI distillation campaigns, urging American firms to enhance defenses amid rising espionage threats.

AI Technology

OpenAI's Sam Altman proposes a new AI regulatory framework as the White House blacklists Anthropic over failed contract negotiations, signaling rising tensions.

AI Regulation

Tennessee's AI Public Safety Act mandates $500M companies to disclose child protection policies while addressing catastrophic risks, following White House input.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.