Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Research

AI Struggles with Humor: Research Reveals LLMs Misinterpret Puns with 20% Accuracy

Cardiff University research reveals that large language models misinterpret puns with only 20% accuracy, highlighting significant limitations in humor comprehension.

Recent research conducted by teams at Cardiff University in south Wales and Ca’ Foscari University of Venice has provided new insights into the limitations of large language models (LLMs) in understanding humor, specifically puns. This study raises important questions about the capabilities of LLMs in grasping complex linguistic phenomena that often rely on cultural and contextual nuances.

Experimental Setup and Limitations

The research team aimed to explore whether LLMs can comprehend puns by evaluating their performance on a series of pun-based sentences. One of the tested examples was: “I used to be a comedian, but my life became a joke.” When this was altered to “I used to be a comedian, but my life became chaotic,” the models still recognized it as a pun. This indicated that LLMs are sensitive to the structure of puns but lack a deeper understanding of their underlying meanings.

In a similar vein, they tested the sentence, “Long fairy tales have a tendency to dragon.” When “dragon” was replaced with the synonym “prolong” or even a random term, the LLMs continued to identify the presence of a pun. This raises significant concerns regarding the models’ interpretative capabilities: while they can identify patterns from their training sets, they do not seem to genuinely understand the humor involved.

Professor Jose Camacho Collados from Cardiff University’s School of Computer Science and Informatics emphasized that the research highlighted the fragile nature of humor comprehension in LLMs. “In general, LLMs tend to memorize what they have learned in their training,” he stated. “They catch existing puns well, but that doesn’t mean they truly understand them.” The study found that when encountering unfamiliar wordplay, the LLMs’ ability to distinguish between humorous and non-humorous sentences can drop to just 20%.

Results and Findings

Another pun tested was: “Old LLMs never die, they just lose their attention.” When “attention” was substituted with “ukulele,” the LLM still perceived it as a pun, reasoning that “ukulele” phonetically resembled “you-kill-LLM.” This instance further illustrates the models’ reliance on phonetic similarities rather than semantic comprehension.

The findings of this research indicate that LLMs are adept at recognizing established puns from their training data but struggle significantly with newly generated or modified puns, demonstrating a clear limitation in their understanding of humor.

Research Significance and Applications

The implications of these findings are substantial, especially for applications requiring nuanced understanding, such as chatbots, customer service interfaces, and creative writing tools. The researchers caution that developers should exercise restraint when employing LLMs in contexts where humor, empathy, or cultural context is vital. The illusion of humor comprehension exhibited by these models could lead to misinterpretations and miscommunications, underscoring the need for human oversight in such applications.

This research was presented at the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, held in Suzhou, China, and is detailed in their paper titled “Pun unintended: LLMs and the illusion of humor understanding.” By shedding light on the limitations of LLMs in one of the more intricate aspects of language, this work contributes to a growing body of literature that seeks to clarify the boundaries of what these models can realistically accomplish.

In summary, while LLMs have demonstrated remarkable prowess in various natural language processing tasks, their grasp of humor remains notably superficial. This study not only emphasizes the necessity for a cautious approach in deploying these models for applications involving humor but also highlights a broader research avenue focusing on understanding and overcoming the limitations of LLMs in interpreting complex linguistic constructs.

Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Regulation

Policymakers propose three distinct regulatory approaches for AI in mental health, highlighting concerns over safety and innovation as states enact fragmented laws.

AI Research

Google introduces nested learning to enhance LLMs' adaptability, achieving superior performance with its HOPE architecture, surpassing competitors like Transformer++ and RetNet.

AI Marketing

Sabre launches Concierge IQ™, a generative AI assistant to enhance airline customer engagement, streamline travel management, and boost loyalty for Virgin Australia.

AI Generative

Generative AI's accuracy in business decisions skyrockets to 95% when effectively integrated with traditional machine learning models, transforming risk management strategies.

Top Stories

LLMs now autonomously generate benchmarks, achieving up to 79% accuracy on task assessments, signaling a transformative approach for AI evaluation by 2025.

AI Government

South Wales is named the UK's latest AI Growth Zone, set to create thousands of jobs and unlock billions in investments, enhancing its global...

AI Marketing

Adobe acquires Semrush for $1.9B, boosting its AI marketing suite with a 77.5% premium, enhancing SEO tools and brand visibility capabilities.

AI Technology

Putin establishes a national task force to boost Russia's generative AI capabilities, aiming for $136.57 billion GDP contribution by 2030 amidst Western sanctions.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.