Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Technology

EU Streamlines AI and Privacy Rules, Easing Data Use for Tech Firms Amid Lobbying Pressure

EU proposes reforms to simplify AI and privacy rules, allowing tech firms like Google and Meta to use personal data without consent while postponing compliance deadlines for high-risk systems.

The European Union is poised to reform its AI and privacy regulations with proposed changes set to be announced this Wednesday. These reforms aim to simplify some of the bloc’s most stringent digital laws, allowing tech companies to use personal data for training AI models under the concept of “legitimate interest,” thereby bypassing the need for explicit consent. Additionally, the EU plans to delay the compliance deadlines for high-risk AI systems by a year.

Implications of the Reforms

The proposed changes are part of a broader initiative known as the “Digital Omnibus,” spearheaded by EU antitrust chief Henna Virkkunen. The goal is to reduce regulatory overlap among several existing frameworks, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the AI Act, the e-Privacy Directive, and the Data Act. Over the last decade, these regulations have been viewed as ambitious yet restrictive, with demands for reform coming from both European and U.S. companies that argue these complex rules stifle innovation.

Should these reforms be implemented, they could significantly reshape the European digital landscape. Compliance could become less burdensome for companies, although critics—including privacy advocates—express concern that these changes might weaken digital rights within Europe. Large tech firms such as Google, Meta, Siemens, and SAP have been vocal in their support for less stringent regulations, arguing that the current frameworks hinder their ability to compete effectively. On the flip side, dissenters caution that this regulatory easing could lead to diminished privacy protections for EU citizens, increasing their exposure to data risks.

The proposed changes have also attracted attention due to pressure from the Trump administration, which has frequently criticized EU regulations as being unfairly targeted towards U.S. companies.

Approval of these reforms will require the consensus of key stakeholders: the European Commission, EU member states, and the European Parliament. The ramifications of this proposal resonate not only with tech companies and lobby groups but also with privacy activists, civil society organizations, and European citizens who are closely monitoring potential compromises on digital rights. Lawmakers such as Brando Benifei have highlighted the importance of safeguarding citizen rights, while advocacy groups like Noyb have referred to the proposals as the “largest rollback of digital fundamental rights in EU history.”

Future Outlook

If the reforms gain approval, they will streamline registration and compliance for AI systems, particularly those deemed high-risk, and offer companies more transparent guidelines. Currently, activists are mobilizing in Brussels, urging Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to withstand influences from Big Tech and foreign entities. The proposals will undergo a thorough examination by EU member states and privacy-focused Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), with the final outcomes poised to significantly impact Europe’s digital regulatory framework for years to come.

As this situation unfolds, the balance between fostering innovation and protecting citizens’ privacy will be at the forefront of discussions, creating a dynamic landscape that will warrant close observation from all stakeholders involved.

With information sourced from Reuters.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Finance

xAI's Grok faces international backlash as France and India probe over 20 instances of AI-generated sexualized images of women and minors, sparking regulatory scrutiny.

AI Business

xAI's Grok faces global backlash as French and Indian authorities investigate over 20 instances of AI-generated explicit images of women and minors.

Top Stories

NAVEX's recent webinar reveals that as the Digital Operational Resilience Act takes effect, compliance leaders must urgently adapt to new global accountability standards driven...

AI Regulation

ASEAN firms must invest in AI governance to meet the EU's 2027 compliance deadline, facing fines up to 7% of global turnover for non-compliance.

AI Regulation

EEA users face access restrictions to a website due to GDPR compliance, highlighting the challenges of digital accessibility amid stringent data privacy laws.

AI Regulation

EU's AI Act mandates compliance for high-risk AI applications by February 2025, challenging companies to adapt swiftly or risk global competitiveness

AI Regulation

EU's GDPR imposes strict compliance for fintech AI, while Qatar's evolving regulations risk user privacy, highlighting the urgent need for international harmonization.

AI Regulation

EU proposes the Digital Omnibus initiative to simplify GDPR compliance, sparking debate over potential privacy trade-offs for businesses and consumers.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.