Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Technology

Goldman Sachs Report: AI Job Losses Cause Lasting Economic Scars for 11M Workers

Goldman Sachs warns that AI-driven job losses could affect 11 million U.S. workers with lasting economic scars, including a 10% earnings decline a decade later.

(CNN) — AI-driven job losses may not only pose immediate challenges for affected workers but also result in prolonged “scarring” effects, characterized by diminished income, delayed homeownership, and lower marriage probabilities, according to a new report from Goldman Sachs. The findings, released Monday, underscore the potential long-term ramifications of job displacement due to rapid advancements in artificial intelligence technology, particularly during economic downturns.

Goldman Sachs previously estimated that between 6% and 7% of U.S. workers, approximately 11 million individuals, could face job displacement as AI technologies continue to evolve. The latest analysis shifts focus to the lingering effects of job losses attributed to AI, following the identification of occupations displaced by technological innovations since 1980. By leveraging data from the National Longitudinal Surveys, economists tracked the labor market trajectories of affected individuals over time.

Economists Pierfrancesco Mei and Jessica Rindels concluded that the impacts of AI-related job displacement can manifest in several ways. The short-term consequences reveal that it takes displaced workers roughly one month longer to secure new employment compared to their peers. Moreover, their inflation-adjusted earnings suffer a more significant decline, exceeding 3% relative to other workers who experience negligible effects.

In the long run, technology-displaced workers experience a stark disparity in real earnings, trailing non-displaced workers by 10 percentage points a decade after losing their jobs. They also face slower wealth accumulation, delayed homeownership, and postponed household formation. The report highlights that these outcomes are exacerbated during recessions, where the adverse effects are amplified—adding an average of three weeks to unemployment durations and increasing the likelihood of subsequent joblessness by 5 percentage points.

Mei and Rindels articulated that these findings suggest that the economic fallout from AI-driven job losses could impose lasting costs on workers, particularly if such displacements coincide with economic recessions. However, the report notes that the challenges are not uniform across the workforce. Younger, college-educated, and urban workers tend to experience less severe income declines, while individuals with shorter tenures or those engaging in retraining initiatives fare better in navigating these disruptions.

Furthermore, the economists emphasized the potential for retraining programs to ease the negative impacts of job displacement. They found that retrained workers often ascend the occupational ladder into roles that demand higher abstract thinking and advanced skills, ultimately reducing their vulnerability to future automation. This observation aligns with past research indicating that younger workers who switch jobs or enhance their skills typically enjoy better outcomes.

As the debate surrounding AI’s influence on employment continues to gain momentum, policymakers, economists, and industry leaders are increasingly focused on the implications of these findings. The role of retraining and skill enhancement programs emerges as a crucial strategy in mitigating job displacement effects, as the labor market adapts to technological innovations. In this rapidly changing landscape, the challenges posed by AI may serve as a catalyst for broader discussions on workforce development and economic resilience in the face of ongoing automation.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Technology

Continuous learning in AI is crucial as 95% of professionals risk obsolescence without ongoing education, driving demand for accessible training solutions.

AI Tools

LiteLLM's compromised versions led to automated EDR intervention, blocking potential data breaches as supply chain attacks escalate in the Python ecosystem.

AI Finance

Deloitte's innovative BEAT platform leverages AI to enhance risk management in regulated industries, addressing compliance challenges and fostering growth.

AI Education

Australia's EdTech market is set to expand from $4.2B in 2025 to $7.7B by 2034, driven by AI innovations and a 6.73% annual growth...

AI Regulation

Colorado becomes the first U.S. state to regulate high-risk AI in employment decisions with the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act, effective February 1, 2026.

AI Research

Google DeepMind recruits PhD students for six to nine-month AI research roles in cancer discovery, enhancing biomedical research capabilities starting May 2026.

AI Cybersecurity

CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz warns AI could slash vulnerability exploit time from five days to just five minutes, intensifying cybersecurity threats as ARR hits...

AI Business

Target's new AI shopping tool, powered by Google’s Gemini, places financial responsibility on customers for AI errors, raising serious accountability concerns.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.