Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

DeepSeek V4 Set to Launch Soon, Promises to Outperform Claude and ChatGPT in Coding

DeepSeek’s V4 model, launching by February 17, aims to outperform Claude and ChatGPT in coding, leveraging innovative training to boost accuracy beyond 80.9%.

**DeepSeek**, a Hangzhou-based AI startup, is poised to launch its highly anticipated **V4 model** within weeks, potentially by **February 17**, coinciding with the **Lunar New Year**. This new iteration aims to excel in elite-level coding challenges, positioning itself as a possible contender against established players like **Claude** from **Anthropic** and **ChatGPT** from **OpenAI**, particularly in tasks requiring long-context code handling. Sources familiar with the model suggest that V4 has already outperformed its rivals in internal benchmarks, fueling excitement among developers eager for a potential disruption in the AI landscape.

While no official announcements from DeepSeek have confirmed these speculations, the developer community is buzzing with energy. Forums like Reddit’s **r/DeepSeek** and **r/LocalLLaMA** are alive with predictions, and users are amassing API credits, reflecting an industry keenly awaiting the model’s release. The anticipation is palpable, given DeepSeek’s track record; its previous model, **R1**, caused a significant market shift when it matched OpenAI’s capabilities at a fraction of the development cost.

DeepSeek’s innovative approach to AI has garnered attention not only for its performance metrics but also for its cost-effectiveness. The R1 model, launched in January 2025, achieved high scores on math and reasoning benchmarks while reportedly costing just **$6 million**—around **68 times cheaper** than its competitors. This value proposition has made DeepSeek a formidable player, particularly as its **V3 model** achieved a remarkable **90.2%** on the **MATH-500 benchmark**, surpassing Claude’s **78.3%**.

V4 represents a strategic pivot for DeepSeek, focusing on coding tasks rather than pure reasoning. While the R1 was engineered for logic and formal proofs, V4 aims to be a hybrid model that effectively addresses the needs of enterprise developers, where accurate code generation can translate directly into revenue. Achieving this goal will require V4 to surpass the current industry standard set by **Claude Opus 4.5**, which boasts an **80.9%** success rate on the **SWE-bench Verified record**. Given DeepSeek’s history, many believe this could be within reach, despite the challenges facing a Chinese AI lab under export restrictions.

Central to DeepSeek’s advancements may be its newly introduced training method, **Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections** (mHC). Co-authored by founder **Liang Wenfeng**, this innovation addresses a significant obstacle in scaling large language models: expanding capacity without compromising stability during training. Traditional AI architectures funnel information through a single narrow pathway, while mHC allows multiple streams to exchange information, mitigating training collapse. This method has been described as a “striking breakthrough” by **Wei Sun**, principal analyst for AI at **Counterpoint Research**, who claims it enables DeepSeek to bypass compute bottlenecks and unlock higher intelligence levels.

Despite the excitement surrounding V4, skepticism persists. Some developers have critiqued DeepSeek’s prior reasoning models for inefficiently allocating compute power on straightforward tasks. Critiques have emerged on platforms such as Medium, where articles have labeled the outputs as “boilerplate nonsense” rife with bugs. Additionally, concerns about privacy and censorship have led some governments to ban DeepSeek’s native applications, adding an extra layer of complexity to its international reception.

Nevertheless, DeepSeek’s momentum is evident, with widespread adoption in Asia and increasing interest from Western enterprises. If V4 lives up to its coding promises, it could further solidify DeepSeek’s reputation as a disruptive force in the AI marketplace. The urgency in the company’s release schedule indicates either a high level of confidence in its capabilities or an acute awareness of the competitive landscape, or perhaps both.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang highlights the AI revolution's scale with over 1.5 million models worldwide, emphasizing infrastructure's crucial role in driving innovation.

AI Research

Stanford and Yale warn that OpenAI’s GPT, Anthropic's Claude, and others can reproduce extensive copyrighted texts, raising potential billion-dollar legal liabilities.

Top Stories

DeepSeek's V4 model, launching February 17, 2024, may surpass ChatGPT and Claude in long-context coding, aiming for over 80% accuracy in Software Engineering tasks.

AI Research

Thinking Machines Lab secures $2B funding at a $12B valuation and launches Tinker, a groundbreaking tool for efficient AI model customization.

AI Technology

NVIDIA and AMD unveil a future where AI becomes the core operating system of life, with AMD predicting a thousandfold increase in AI chip...

Top Stories

DeepSeek's V4 model, launching February 17, aims to surpass Claude and GPT in coding performance, leveraging a $6 million development cost and innovative mHC...

Top Stories

Nvidia, Broadcom, and Amazon are set to lead the AI market's explosive growth, with Nvidia's EPS projected to soar 45% and Broadcom's AI revenue...

AI Business

As enterprises double down on AI investments, OpenAI faces intensified competition from Google's Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot, threatening its market dominance.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.