Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Google Gemini Launches Scheduled Actions, Matching ChatGPT’s Automation Features

Google’s AI assistant Gemini now offers scheduled actions for $20/month, enabling proactive task management like daily updates, rivaling ChatGPT’s automation features.

In a significant update that enhances its competitive standing, Google has introduced scheduled actions for its AI assistant, Gemini. This feature aligns Google’s offering with OpenAI’s popular ChatGPT, which has provided similar automation capabilities for several months. Both AI platforms now allow paid subscribers to set up recurring tasks, such as daily weather updates or weekly trivia questions, without requiring the app to be actively open.

Priced at $20 monthly for both the Google AI Pro and ChatGPT Plus subscriptions, users can manage up to 10 scheduled actions simultaneously. This move is strategically timed as companies in generative AI increasingly vie for user engagement. The scheduling feature transforms these chatbots from sporadic tools into reliable digital assistants that can proactively meet users’ needs.

Google’s documentation outlines potential use cases, suggesting routines like receiving a weather and news report every morning at 7 AM or meal suggestions each evening at the same time. Users can easily instruct the AI to perform tasks like “generate an image of a cat playing with a ball of yarn every Monday at 12 PM,” and the AI will confirm the details before executing the action. Notably, these tasks will run regardless of whether the user is online, with notifications delivered through email or push alerts.

The subscription model remains consistent across both platforms, set at $20 per month, with a limit of 10 simultaneous actions that compel users to prioritize their requests carefully. While Google’s Gemini supports scheduling on daily, weekly, and monthly cycles, more complex arrangements, such as tasks scheduled for “every second Tuesday,” are currently not accommodated.

See alsoElon Musk Launches Grokipedia as AI-Powered Rival to Wikipedia, Faces Criticism for AccuracyElon Musk Launches Grokipedia as AI-Powered Rival to Wikipedia, Faces Criticism for Accuracy

Differences in user interfaces are apparent when comparing the two platforms. Gemini allows direct editing capabilities within its web version, while ChatGPT necessitates a visit to a dedicated task management panel found under Settings > Notifications > Manage tasks. The mobile applications for both services replicate their respective web functionalities, although ChatGPT’s task boxes offer more control options for users.

The Shift Towards Proactive AI Assistance

This new feature signifies a notable shift towards proactive AI assistance. Instead of waiting for user prompts, these systems are now designed to anticipate and fulfill user needs based on predetermined schedules. Early use cases extend across various domains, including productivity—such as preparing daily agendas or setting deadline reminders—entertainment—like prompting trivia questions or aiding in creative writing—and wellness, where they can provide workout motivation or meal planning suggestions.

As the landscape of AI continues to evolve, the introduction of scheduled actions by Google represents not only a direct challenge to OpenAI but also a broader trend in the AI industry: the quest to embed AI deeper into daily routines. This strategic enhancement ensures that both Google and OpenAI remain relevant as they work to transform their products into indispensable tools for everyday life.

Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

At the 2025 Cerebral Valley AI Conference, over 300 attendees identified AI search startup Perplexity and OpenAI as the most likely to falter amidst...

Top Stories

OpenAI's financial leak reveals it paid Microsoft $493.8M in 2024, with inference costs skyrocketing to $8.65B in 2025, highlighting revenue challenges.

AI Cybersecurity

Anthropic"s report of AI-driven cyberattacks faces significant doubts from experts.

Top Stories

Microsoft's Satya Nadella endorses OpenAI's $100B revenue goal by 2027, emphasizing urgent funding needs for AI innovation and competitiveness.

AI Technology

Cities like San Jose and Hawaii are deploying AI technologies, including dashcams and street sweeper cameras, to reduce traffic fatalities and improve road safety,...

AI Business

Satya Nadella promotes AI as a platform for mutual growth and innovation.

AI Technology

Shanghai plans to automate over 70% of its dining operations by 2028, transforming the restaurant landscape with AI-driven kitchens and services.

AI Government

AI initiatives in Hawaii and San Jose aim to improve road safety by detecting hazards.

Generative AI

OpenAI's Sam Altman celebrates ChatGPT"s new ability to follow em dash formatting instructions.

AI Technology

An MIT study reveals that 95% of generative AI projects fail to achieve expected results

AI Technology

Meta will implement 'AI-driven impact' in employee performance reviews starting in 2026, requiring staff to leverage AI tools for productivity enhancements.

AI Technology

Andrej Karpathy envisions self-driving cars reshaping cities by reducing noise and reclaiming space.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.