Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Hugging Face Reveals Reasoning AI Models Use 30x More Energy Than Traditional Models

Hugging Face reveals that new reasoning AI models consume 30 times more energy than traditional models, raising sustainability concerns in AI technology.

Concerns about the rising energy consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) have intensified, as a new analysis reveals that the latest reasoning models demand significantly more energy than their predecessors. This trend raises alarms that the energy requirements and carbon footprint associated with AI could escalate more rapidly than previously anticipated.

As AI tools increasingly integrate into daily life, the electricity required to operate them has become a focal point of concern. Initial apprehensions were primarily centered around the substantial costs involved in training large models. However, current energy demands largely stem from the need to respond to user queries.

Research conducted by teams from Hugging Face and Salesforce highlights that the newest generation of AI models, which process information step by step before delivering answers, are notably more power-intensive. The study indicates that certain models consume up to 700 times more energy when their reasoning functionality is activated.

“We should be smarter about the way that we use AI,” stated Sasha Luccioni, a research scientist at Hugging Face and co-lead of the project, in comments to Bloomberg. “Choosing the right model for the right task is important.”

This analysis is part of the AI Energy Score project, which seeks to establish standardized metrics for evaluating AI energy efficiency. Each model undergoes testing across ten tasks using custom datasets and the latest generation of graphics processing units (GPUs). Researchers assess the number of watt-hours consumed to respond to 1,000 queries.

Models receive a star rating from one to five, similar to energy efficiency labels found on consumer products in various countries. However, this benchmarking process is limited to open or partially open models, leaving many leading closed models from major AI labs untested.

In the latest update to the project’s leaderboard, researchers examined reasoning models for the first time. They discovered that, on average, these models consume 30 times more energy than those without reasoning capabilities or with their reasoning modes disabled, with some models demonstrating energy usage hundreds of times greater.

The increased energy consumption stems from the nature of AI reasoning. These models function as text generators, where each segment of text produced requires energy. Instead of simply providing straightforward answers, reasoning models engage in an internal dialogue (“think aloud”), generating extensive text as they navigate problem-solving. This process can amplify the volume of generated text dramatically, leading to a corresponding surge in energy consumption.

Identifying which models are most susceptible to this energy-intensive behavior can be complex. Traditionally, model size was the primary indicator of energy use; however, with reasoning models, their verbosity during reasoning tasks often serves as a more significant predictor. This complexity emphasizes the necessity of benchmarks in assessing energy efficiency.

Previous studies, including one published in June in Frontiers in Communication, have similarly found that reasoning models can produce up to 50 times more CO₂ emissions compared to models designed for concise responses. Despite their inefficiency, reasoning models offer heightened capabilities, complicating the decision-making process for users.

“Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in LLM technologies,” remarked Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences, who led the earlier study. “None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO₂ equivalent achieved higher than 80 percent accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly.”

As the understanding of energy impacts associated with reasoning models continues to evolve, persuading users to forgo these powerful tools may prove challenging. The balance between enhanced capabilities and sustainability remains a pressing issue in the ongoing discourse surrounding the future of AI technology.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

Top Stories

Cohu, Inc. posts Q4 2025 sales rise to $122.23M but widens annual loss to $74.27M, highlighting risks amid semiconductor market volatility.

Top Stories

ValleyNXT Ventures launches the ₹400 crore Bharat Breakthrough Fund to accelerate seed-stage AI and defence startups with a unique VC-plus-accelerator model

AI Regulation

Clarkesworld halts new submissions amid a surge of AI-generated stories, prompting industry-wide adaptations as publishers face unprecedented content challenges.

AI Technology

Donald Thompson of Workplace Options emphasizes the critical role of psychological safety in AI integration, advocating for human-centered leadership to enhance organizational culture.

AI Tools

KPMG fines a partner A$10,000 for using AI to cheat in internal training, amid a trend of over two dozen staff caught in similar...

Top Stories

IBM faces investor scrutiny as its stock trades 24% below target at $262.38, despite launching new AI products and hiring for next-gen skills.

AI Finance

Apollo Global Management reveals a $40 trillion vision for private credit and anticipates $5-$7 trillion in AI funding over the next five years at...

AI Cybersecurity

Seventy percent of firms in Dubai are prioritizing AI, projected to drive the cybersecurity market to $23.54 billion with a 14.55% growth this year.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.