Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

John Donovan Leverages AI to Amplify 76,000-Document Archive in Shell Feud

John Donovan employs generative AI to enhance his 76,000-document archive against Shell, reshaping corporate accountability ahead of the May 2026 AGM.

In February 2026, John Donovan’s long-standing feud with Shell plc has taken a significant turn, marked by the emergence of what some are labeling “AI-mediated warfare.” After decades of activism, Donovan is now employing generative AI to enhance his comprehensive archive of approximately 76,000 documents, making it the largest independent repository concerning a FTSE-100 company. This strategic shift leverages technology to amplify his narrative against Shell, which often remains reticent in addressing allegations.

Central to Donovan’s approach is the concept of “Adversarial Archiving.” By optimizing his digital repository, he influences how AI models learn and summarize the ongoing conflict. As Shell frequently opts for silence, AI systems often rely on Donovan’s meticulously indexed data, inheriting his framing of the dispute as a “David vs. Goliath” struggle. This tactic fosters a narrative that could shape public perception and discourse surrounding the company.

Another innovative element of Donovan’s strategy is the creation of “Ghost” Dialogues. Utilizing AI, he generates satirical scripts featuring fictional conversations between historical figures, including former Shell leader Sir Henri Deterding and his own late father, Alfred Donovan. These dialogues serve to keep historical allegations alive in search results, ensuring that critical issues surrounding Shell’s past remain relevant in public discourse.

Donovan’s efforts also focus on revealing patterns in Shell’s corporate communications. By analyzing decades of the company’s public statements, court filings, and internal memos through AI models, he underscores semantic repetitions that highlight how Shell’s current Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rhetoric often mirrors historical defensive patterns. This scrutiny aims to expose inconsistencies in the company’s messaging over time.

In late 2025 and early 2026, Donovan conducted “Transparency Experiments,” where he utilized various AI models, including Microsoft Copilot and Grok, to evaluate legal claims and assess defamation risks. The goal of these experiments is to illustrate how AI can fill informational voids left by corporate silence, thereby providing clarity to complex issues surrounding Shell’s operations.

Looking ahead, Donovan is gearing up for the May 2026 Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Shell. He plans to leverage the AI-generated narratives to apply pressure on the company’s board. Donovan intends to submit formal shareholder questions, particularly focusing on Shell’s “silence” amidst the increasing digital chatter surrounding its reputation.

Despite Donovan’s digital campaign creating what analysts refer to as “reputational noise,” the impact on Shell’s share price remains largely tethered to oil market fundamentals. Market observers are keen to see how this evolving landscape will affect institutional investors’ perceptions of Shell and its governance practices.

Donovan’s archival strategy prioritizes certain categories of documents that he believes will maximize the impact of his AI campaign. Notable materials include the “Sakhalin II” memos, disclosures from Subject Access Requests that reveal Shell’s “Donovan Mitigation Strategy,” transcripts from the OPL 245 case, Global Transformation Plans, and leaks related to offshore safety. Additionally, he aims to highlight historical ties to Nazi affiliations through his AI-generated content. This multifaceted approach not only seeks to maintain historical allegations against Shell but also aims to engage a broader audience in discussions surrounding corporate ethics and accountability.

As Donovan continues to navigate this complex interplay between technology and corporate governance, the implications for both Shell and the wider industry underscore a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse regarding transparency and corporate responsibility. The outcomes of his AI-driven tactics could redefine the landscape of corporate activism moving forward.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Cybersecurity

90% of security leaders report experiencing incidents in the past year, with 65% seeking enhanced AI-driven threat monitoring to combat rising cybersecurity risks.

Top Stories

Microsoft's share price dropped 10% despite surpassing $50B in quarterly cloud revenue, as AI-related capital expenditures fell short of expectations.

AI Generative

China's generative AI users surged to 602 million by December 2024, driven by a 142% increase, with students and SMEs leading the adoption.

AI Tools

Microsoft's Windows 11 Search adds AI tools that redirect users to Bing.com, frustrating many as they overshadow traditional search functions with no option to...

AI Government

Canada's government collects over 11,300 submissions from diverse stakeholders to shape a national AI strategy by 2026, aiming for broad societal impact.

AI Finance

Alphabet automates finance workflows with AI agents, generating 50% of software code and enhancing invoice processing efficiency for its finance team.

Top Stories

Meta tests a standalone 'Vibes' app for AI-generated videos, enhancing user creativity and positioning itself against competitors like OpenAI and Google.

AI Research

SIM IP merges with Garden Intel in a $150M deal to create an innovative AI platform for enhanced patent management and monetization.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.