Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

New AI Regulations Risk Leaving Small Hospitals Behind, Warns Kaiser Permanente

66% of U.S. physicians now use AI in practice, but new regulations risk widening the gap between large and small health care organizations, warns Kaiser Permanente.

Recent data from a survey conducted by the American Medical Association reveals that 66% of physicians in the United States are currently incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into their medical practices. This growing integration signifies a pivotal shift in health care workflows, allowing clinicians to leverage AI for various applications, from diagnostics to patient management. However, as these AI tools become more ubiquitous, the need for responsible governance and oversight is becoming increasingly critical.

State policymakers and regulatory bodies, including the Joint Commission, are beginning to formulate new regulations aimed at overseeing the use of AI in health care. This discourse raises an essential question: Will these regulations benefit all health care organizations and their patients, or will they predominantly advantage those with the resources to navigate complex regulatory landscapes?

The AI Divide: Addressing Disparities

The conversation often revolves around the concept of “AI haves and have-nots.” Larger health care organizations, such as Kaiser Permanente, possess the financial resources, data infrastructure, and expertise necessary to effectively deploy AI tools while adhering to stringent regulations. In contrast, smaller hospitals, rural clinicians, and community clinics frequently struggle to maintain even basic IT infrastructures, let alone manage intricate new regulations.

Without careful planning and consideration, regulations intended to enhance safety may inadvertently exacerbate the AI divide within the health care sector. The decisions made at this juncture will shape whether smaller providers, and consequently their patients, are left behind or whether the entire health care community can achieve a higher standard of care.

Crafting Inclusive Regulations

Effective regulatory frameworks should aim to assist all organizations equally, rather than favoring those already at the forefront of technology. Kaiser Permanente advocates for regulations that establish a clear baseline for privacy, safety, and human oversight without assuming that the most advanced organizations should set the standard for all. This balance is vital, especially given the multiple state proposals emerging, each with varying definitions and compliance expectations. Even larger organizations will find it challenging to keep up, and for smaller or rural hospitals, the burden could be overwhelming.

To function optimally, regulations governing AI in health care should adhere to several key principles:

  • Keep it simple. Streamlined and consistent regulations can reduce both costs and confusion.
  • Maintain flexibility. Requirements should be adaptable to organizations of varying sizes and accommodate new technologies.
  • Provide organizational support. Health care entities are seeking more than just guidelines; they require resources and pragmatic assistance for the responsible deployment of AI technologies.

Kaiser Permanente’s Commitment to Responsible AI Use

As a nonprofit organization, Kaiser Permanente is dedicated to sharing insights and learnings with the broader health care community. Our leadership in AI and data-driven care is not solely focused on enhancing our own outcomes; we aim to facilitate progress across the entire health ecosystem, ensuring that all patients benefit.

To fulfill this mission, Kaiser Permanente actively engages in several initiatives:

  • Sharing best practices. We publish our AI testing methods and evaluation processes, enabling other organizations to adapt these frameworks.
  • Developing and publishing research. Our research efforts focus on AI in clinical care, contributing valuable knowledge to advance the field.
  • Collaborating on policy. We work to shape clear, practical regulations that build trust within the health care community, engaging policymakers and accreditation bodies through events and educational efforts.

These initiatives are designed not only to enhance safety and transparency in AI applications but also to ensure equitable access across the health care sector, allowing patients across the United States to benefit from AI advancements, rather than limiting these opportunities to those served by larger health organizations.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Tools

AI adoption in India surges, with IT firms reporting 20-30% faster task completion, yet productivity growth stagnates, raising concerns over economic impact.

Top Stories

AI threatens 12% of U.S. jobs as HP cuts 6,000 positions and UPS reduces 12,000 roles, signaling a drastic shift toward automation investments.

AI Regulation

Europe's banking sector faces upheaval as Morgan Stanley forecasts 200,000 job cuts by 2030, driven by AI that boosts efficiency by 30%.

Top Stories

DeepSeek's open-source R1 model outperforms OpenAI and Google in math and programming, costing just $6M, while xAI's Grok 4.1 revolutionizes user interactions.

AI Generative

Top 10 US generative AI companies, including OpenAI and Google, are driving innovation with enterprise solutions that enhance automation and transform workflows.

Top Stories

Global semiconductor giants like TSMC and Samsung face capped innovation under new U.S.-China export controls, limiting advanced tech upgrades and reshaping supply chains.

AI Tools

Over 60% of U.S. consumers now rely on AI platforms for primary digital interactions, signaling a major shift in online commerce and user engagement.

AI Regulation

As the U.S. enacts the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act, firms face 72-hour reporting mandates, elevating compliance costs and legal risks.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.