Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Finance

AI Bias and Job Displacement Threaten Women’s Roles in Tech, Finance Sectors

Women hold only 19.1% of tech CEO roles, while 119,000 clerical jobs at risk of AI automation threaten economic stability in the finance sector.

The tech and finance sectors continue to grapple with gender imbalance, as women represent only 21% of the tech workforce. Research from Grant Thornton reveals a stark disparity in leadership roles, with only 19.1% of tech CEOs being women, compared to 25.8% among mid-market firms globally. This situation is compounded by the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), which is automating many positions traditionally held by women and perpetuating existing biases. As AI reshapes workplace dynamics, it is crucial to develop strategies that address its impact on female workers.

According to a report from the City of London, approximately 119,000 clerical roles in tech, finance, and professional services are at risk of being automated over the next decade. This is particularly concerning given that female clerical workers account for 10% of the financial sector workforce and represent 68% of clerical roles overall. The potential displacement of these jobs could result in severance costs estimated at £752 million ($1.02 billion), highlighting the economic ramifications for an already pressured sector.

The lower adoption rates of AI tools among women may further exacerbate these challenges. Studies indicate a 25% gap in AI uptake between men and women. From November 2022 to May 2024, women constituted just 42% of the 200 million average monthly users on ChatGPT’s website and only 27% of the app’s downloads. This hesitance to engage with AI technologies could hinder women’s professional development and limit their integration into evolving workplace environments, which increasingly demand AI literacy.

As fewer women utilize AI tools, the feedback loop from female users diminishes, which is critical, especially during the early rollout phases of these technologies. This lack of representation in user data can lead to suboptimal AI development and deployment, further entrenching biases and reducing overall productivity within organizations.

The inherent bias of AI

Biases in AI are pervasive, affecting various sectors, including healthcare and recruitment. For instance, generative AI often depicts men in authoritative roles, such as doctors and CEOs, while women are typically shown in supportive roles, such as nurses. Research conducted at the London School of Economics (LSE), funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, revealed that Google’s Gemma AI model tended to downplay female symptoms in both physical and mental health contexts when generating and summarizing case notes. This troubling pattern underscores the systemic issues women face within AI-driven systems.

In 2018, Amazon halted the development of an AI recruiting tool that was found to favor male candidates, demonstrating how ingrained biases can adversely affect hiring processes. Such biases not only reflect societal norms but also reinforce them, leading to fewer opportunities for women. To address these issues, companies must prioritize reskilling and upskilling female employees, ensuring they are equipped with the knowledge required to navigate AI technologies and recognize potential biases.

Technology firms should also take responsibility for the data used to train algorithms, ensuring that it is diverse and representative. Furthermore, incorporating more women into development teams can help create AI systems that are more equitable and responsive to a diverse workforce. Governments, too, have a critical role to play by implementing robust legislation governing the use of AI in sensitive areas like healthcare and recruitment, making companies accountable for the biases inherent in their systems.

As the landscape of work continues to evolve with the rise of AI, addressing gender disparity in the workforce is not just a matter of fairness; it is essential for fostering innovation and productivity in the sectors most impacted by these technological changes. Without proactive measures to ensure equitable representation and minimize bias, the risk is high that the technological advancements of the future will perpetuate the gender imbalances of the past.

See also
Marcus Chen
Written By

At AIPressa, my work focuses on analyzing how artificial intelligence is redefining business strategies and traditional business models. I've covered everything from AI adoption in Fortune 500 companies to disruptive startups that are changing the rules of the game. My approach: understanding the real impact of AI on profitability, operational efficiency, and competitive advantage, beyond corporate hype. When I'm not writing about digital transformation, I'm probably analyzing financial reports or studying AI implementation cases that truly moved the needle in business.

You May Also Like

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.