The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is sparking a new race in Silicon Valley, as companies compete to launch what are being termed “agentic browsers.” With the introduction of Opera’s Neon AI browser on December 11, priced at $20 per month, the landscape is becoming increasingly crowded. These browsers promise to function as AI assistants capable of browsing, clicking, and reasoning on behalf of users, a shift from traditional browser extensions that provide simpler forms of assistance.
Neon’s capabilities include video analysis, text drafting, and executing multi-step tasks, positioning it as a proactive solution for those seeking to automate their online activities. Yet, as more players enter the field, a critical question emerges: are these AI tools equipped to handle the intricate financial and business workflows they aim to support, or are they falling short of expectations?
According to a report by Bloomberg, developers of agentic browsers aspire to overcome decades of platform lock-in by creating assistants that execute complex tasks on the open web. Instead of manually entering queries and navigating multiple tabs, users could simply issue commands that the browser interprets and carries out. The appeal lies in the potential to automate manual tasks that currently consume significant time.
However, early testing indicates that the technology often struggles with comprehending webpage layouts, decision points, and the underlying logic of user intent. PYMNTS has documented experiences from early adopters who describe issues such as stalled actions and looping behavior. These setbacks can hinder the workflows that these tools are designed to streamline.
One major hurdle for AI browsers is the difference between how websites are constructed for human interaction and how machines interpret those designs. This disconnect forces AI models to guess the meanings of buttons and menus, thereby increasing the chances of errors. A common application of these browsers is summarizing lengthy YouTube videos and querying the AI about the topics discussed. Users of Comet have reported asking “six to 18 times more questions” than they did with the basic Perplexity chatbot, according to Jesse Dwyer, head of communications at the company.
The demand for these functionalities is evident. Adam Fry, a product lead on OpenAI’s Atlas browser, noted that the team has received numerous requests from users wishing to automate recurring tasks, such as having the browser generate monthly reports or dashboards from online applications.
However, the rise of AI browsers is also giving rise to security and trust issues. These new tools introduce risks that traditional browsers have long mitigated, with concerns surrounding prompt-injection attacks that could mislead the AI into executing harmful actions. If an agent misinterprets malicious content as legitimate commands, the consequences could jeopardize user safety. Developers acknowledge the necessity for new safety measures, though the existing security models are still evolving.
Enterprises remain wary of deploying these technologies, as unintended actions on financial platforms or internal systems pose significant risks. Historically, browsers have operated as secure environments where user intent is clear and verifiable. The ambiguity introduced by agentic workflows is a challenge that many organizations are not equipped to handle. Even among consumer users, there is hesitation to allow automated systems to complete forms or manage sensitive transactions.
As security frameworks develop, the functionality of AI browsers may remain limited to less critical tasks for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, established browsers are rapidly adapting. Google has integrated Gemini capabilities into Chrome, offering AI summarization, search optimization, and writing tools within a familiar interface. Similarly, Microsoft is enhancing Edge with comparable features.
These advancements reduce the perceived advantages of fully agentic browsers. If users can access AI capabilities without switching tools or dealing with potential instability, their motivation to transition to new platforms diminishes. The evolution of AI integration within existing browsers suggests that while agentic browsers may offer intriguing possibilities, their immediate future may hinge on overcoming significant hurdles in usability and security.
See also
Zapier Reveals 6 Steps to Effectively Integrate AI into Business Workflows
Amazon CTO Reveals AI Sparks a ‘Developer Renaissance’ at AWS re:Invent 2025
Apollo Cuts Software Exposure to Below 10% Amid AI Disruption Concerns
