As state legislatures across the U.S. grapple with the implications of artificial intelligence (AI), several bills aimed at regulating its use are gaining traction. With Georgia’s legislature set to adjourn on April 6, the spotlight is on SB 540, a critical chatbot safety and disclosure bill that has already passed the Senate and is currently under consideration in the House.
SB 540 mandates transparency by requiring chatbot providers to disclose when users are interacting with AI. It also implements measures to safeguard minors by limiting certain actions and providing tools for privacy as well as protocols to address issues surrounding suicidal ideation or self-harm. The bill received Senate approval on March 6 and was read for the second time in the House on March 10. In contrast, other AI-related bills in Georgia, such as SB 488, which addresses product liability related to generative AI, have stalled, having been tabled after limited movement.
In Hawaii, meanwhile, three of six introduced AI bills are moving forward. Notably, HB 1782, which aims to protect minors from the risks posed by AI companion systems, recently passed the House on March 10 and is awaiting Senate review. Similarly, SB 3001, which requires AI operators to disclose important information to users and develop protocols to prevent harmful outcomes, is also progressing. Another bill, HB 2137, focused on regulating harmful uses of deepfake technology, has garnered attention, with all three bills now moving to the Senate for further discussion.
Idaho’s legislative efforts in AI appear robust, with all four introduced bills making headway. SB 1227, which addresses the use of generative AI in public education, recently cleared the Senate and is scheduled for a third reading. Additionally, the Conversational AI Safety Act, SB 1297, is set for an executive session, while HB 727, which amends existing laws to include synthetic media in definitions of video voyeurism, has passed the House and is currently in the Senate State Affairs Committee.
Illinois stands out with over a dozen active AI-related bills. New to the agenda is HB 5044, which establishes liability for chatbot providers, holding them accountable for user harm. Both HB 4705 and SB 3261 aim to bolster public safety and child protection in relation to AI, while additional bills address issues ranging from AI in healthcare to transparency in AI use. The legislative landscape in Illinois reflects the state’s proactive stance on AI regulation, as lawmakers work to address its complexities across various sectors.
In contrast, Indiana’s two AI bills, HB 1201 and HB 1182, appear stalled as the legislature heads toward adjournment on March 14. These proposals aimed at regulating AI in mental health contexts and defining digital sexual image abuse have not moved beyond committee discussions. Similarly, Iowa’s SSB 3013, which would grant ownership of AI-generated content to its creators, has not seen progress since its approval by committee on February 2.
Kansas is also advancing its AI legislation, with several bills currently under consideration before the scheduled adjournment on April 10. Notable among them is HB 2518, which expands breach of privacy laws, and HB 2594, which modifies blackmail statutes to include AI-generated images. Both bills passed the House unanimously and are awaiting hearings in the Senate. Kansas lawmakers are also exploring implications for medical decision-making and age verification in AI chatbot access.
In Kentucky, six AI-related bills are in play, among which HB 227, a chatbot safety measure, has received unanimous support in the House and is now with the Senate. The state is also evaluating legislation concerning AI in mental health therapy, with HB 455 having cleared the House and awaiting further action.
As these legislative efforts unfold, they underscore the growing recognition of AI’s impact on society and the urgent need for regulatory frameworks. States are increasingly acknowledging the importance of safeguarding vulnerable populations, especially minors, while addressing the ethical implications of AI technology. The outcomes of these bills may set precedents for future legislation, shaping the landscape of AI regulation across the United States.
See also
OpenAI’s Rogue AI Safeguards: Decoding the 2025 Safety Revolution
US AI Developments in 2025 Set Stage for 2026 Compliance Challenges and Strategies
Trump Drafts Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Centralizing Authority Under Federal Control
California Court Rules AI Misuse Heightens Lawyer’s Responsibilities in Noland Case
Policymakers Urged to Establish Comprehensive Regulations for AI in Mental Health
