The pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI) has emerged as a hallmark of innovation in Silicon Valley. However, Daniela Amodei, president and cofounder of Anthropic, recently suggested that the concept of AGI may be losing its relevance as a metric for measuring AI development. In an interview with CNBC, Amodei remarked, “AGI is such a funny term. Many years ago, it was kind of a useful concept to say, ‘When will artificial intelligence be as capable as a human?'” She pointed out that today’s understanding of AI capabilities is evolving rapidly, rendering traditional definitions inadequate.
Amodei noted that by some definitions, AI has already surpassed human capabilities in certain domains. She cited the example of Claude, Anthropic’s advanced AI model, which is capable of writing code on par with many professional engineers, even those within the company. “That’s crazy,” she said, emphasizing how swiftly these advancements have occurred. Yet, she acknowledged that AI systems still lack the holistic problem-solving and emotional intelligence that humans naturally possess. “Claude still can’t do a lot of things that humans can do,” she added, highlighting the gap that remains.
This dichotomy raises questions about the utility of the AGI construct itself. Amodei expressed her belief that the framework may now be outdated. “I think maybe the construct itself is now wrong — or maybe not wrong, but just outdated,” she stated. Her comments come at a time when Anthropic and its competitors are investing tens of billions of dollars into developing ever more sophisticated models and the requisite infrastructure.
Despite skepticism from some critics who argue that large language models won’t lead to true general intelligence without significant breakthroughs, Amodei remains optimistic about the trajectory of AI development. “We don’t know,” she said regarding potential future breakthroughs. “Nothing slows down until it does.” She emphasized that rather than focus intently on achieving a singular goal like AGI, the more pressing issue is how to effectively integrate increasingly capable AI systems into organizations and how rapidly humans and institutions can adapt to these changes.
Amodei underscored that even if technical capabilities continue to improve, the adoption of AI can lag due to various practical concerns. These include change management, procurement, and the challenge of identifying where AI can truly add value. She contended that the future of AI will not be dictated by whether it meets a textbook definition of AGI but rather by what these systems can accomplish, where they still fall short, and how society decides to deploy them.
As the discussion around AGI evolves, it reflects broader considerations in AI ethics, governance, and the role of technology in society. The implications of integrating AI into everyday applications raise critical questions about trust, accountability, and the societal impacts of these powerful tools. Thus, while the quest for AGI continues to attract significant attention, the emphasis may need to shift towards practical application and responsible management, marking a new chapter in the ongoing narrative of artificial intelligence.
See also
Pure Storage’s AI Partnership with NVIDIA Sparks Investor Interest Amid Growth Risks
Seattle Summit Mobilizes Tech Giants to Transition AI from Labs to Life-Saving Applications
DeepSnitch AI Rises 115% in Presale, Attracts $1.1M as Crypto Capital Shifts to Altcoins
AI Boom Masks Debt-Fueled Inequality as Fed Cuts Rates Amid Economic Fragility
India AI Summit 2026: Transforming Human Capital for an Inclusive Future
