As investments in artificial intelligence (AI) skyrocket, questions linger regarding their actual impact on economic growth. Companies are pouring trillions into AI development, positioning it as a leading force in global corporate investment, according to a report by Reuters citing insights from the co-chief investment officers (CIOs) of Bridgewater Associates, a prominent asset management firm. The firm predicts that AI investments will continue to surge, substantially reshaping the economy. However, its tangible effects on GDP growth are still uncertain, as noted by economic strategist Prajakta Bhide from MRB Partners.
AI’s role as a key driver of investment has contributed to a stock market rally, with major indices closing 2025 with double-digit gains. This momentum has been fueled by heightened investor interest in AI-linked stocks like Nvidia and Meta. The Bridgewater CIOs, who include Bob Prince, Greg Jensen, and Karen Karniol-Tambour, indicated in a client note on Monday that the competitive landscape compels companies to ramp up their capital expenditures on AI. “Straightforward game-theoretic calculations make it unacceptable for these companies to accept falling behind rivals by even a few months of progress,” they stated.
However, as optimism around AI spending grows, the Bridgewater CIOs warn that increased capital expenditures could lead to inflationary pressures. Rising demands could drive up prices for essential components like electronic chips and electricity, which are critical for AI development. “Easy policy risks further accelerating speculative equity market activity and the frenzy of deal-making and AI investment that’s already underway,” they cautioned, suggesting a potential bubble in the market.
Despite the bullish outlook, the January report from MRB Partners challenges the narrative that AI-related capital investments are the primary drivers of U.S. GDP growth. Bhide pointed out that while AI is a significant player in the growth story, it isn’t the only factor. “That’s a narrative that’s out there, that if we didn’t have the AI capex, GDP would have slumped last year. And that’s simply not true,” Bhide emphasized in a CNBC interview.
Highlighting the role of consumption as the principal driver of economic growth, Bhide explained that much of the high-tech equipment necessary for AI development is imported. Consequently, the contribution of AI to GDP is less significant than commonly perceived. His research indicated that without accounting for imports, AI-related equipment contributed approximately 90 basis points, or 0.9%, to real GDP growth in the U.S. from the first to the third quarter of 2025. However, when adjustments for imports were factored in, the net contribution to real GDP was reduced to between 40 and 50 basis points, representing merely 20% to 25% of the growth during that period.
Bhide’s findings suggest that while large data centers capture significant attention, the most crucial contributions to GDP growth from AI investments in 2025 stemmed from software and computer technologies. The implications of these insights extend beyond mere statistics; they challenge prevailing assumptions about the economic significance of AI and highlight the complexities of its integration into existing markets.
As the dialogue around AI and its economic implications continues to evolve, the mixed signals presented by investment trends and growth contributions underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of this rapidly changing landscape. Policymakers and industry leaders must navigate these dynamics to address potential inflationary pressures while fostering an environment conducive to sustainable growth.
See also
Nvidia Invests €1.7B in Mistral, $600M in Quantinuum, and Backing for Revolut
Germany”s National Team Prepares for World Cup Qualifiers with Disco Atmosphere
95% of AI Projects Fail in Companies According to MIT
AI in Food & Beverages Market to Surge from $11.08B to $263.80B by 2032














































