In the fast-paced realm of artificial intelligence, Google has introduced groundbreaking features to its Photos app that enable users to edit images through conversational AI. However, residents of Texas and Illinois find these tools frustratingly inaccessible due to stringent state privacy regulations concerning biometric data. This situation underscores a growing conflict between technological advancement and personal privacy rights.
Google’s ‘Ask Photos’ and related AI editing capabilities, utilizing models like Gemini Nano, allow users to search and modify their photo libraries using natural language, offering personalized edits such as adding elements to images or refining searches based on context-aware queries. Unfortunately, as reported by CNET, these features are not available in Texas and Illinois, raising questions about the reasons behind this limitation.
The Privacy Law Labyrinth
Legal experts attribute this lack of access to stringent biometric privacy laws. Illinois enacted the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) in 2008, which mandates that companies obtain explicit consent before collecting or using biometric identifiers like facial scans. Texas has enacted a similar law, known as the Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act. According to CNET, the issue likely revolves around Google Photos’ Face Groups feature, which employs facial recognition for image organization—effectively collecting biometric data.
Sharon Sandeen, a professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, noted, “The collection of biometric data through facial recognition is heavily regulated in these states.” This regulatory climate has led to substantial settlements for tech giants; notably, Google itself faced a $100 million payout in 2022 due to BIPA violations linked to its Photos service.
See also
Web Summit Highlights ‘Agentic AI’ Risks as Experts Warn of Over-Caution in EuropeGoogle’s Past Legal Battles
Google’s history with biometric privacy lawsuits highlights the need for caution. In 2019, the company was involved in a class-action suit that accused it of scanning faces in photos without consent. Reports from Reuters indicate that Google settled for $100 million without admitting any wrongdoing. This case set a significant precedent regarding how AI features that involve facial data are treated in states with stringent regulations.
Recent expansions of Google Photos’ AI functionalities, announced in a TechCrunch article on November 11, 2025, include new editing tools powered by the Nano Banana model, extending availability to over 100 countries. However, as noted by TechCrunch, these advancements come with caveats in the U.S., where state-specific laws create a patchy rollout of features.
State-Specific Regulations in Focus
Illinois’ BIPA is particularly stringent, allowing private citizens to sue for violations, with damages reaching up to $5,000 per willful infraction. Texas’ legislation, while somewhat less litigious, still prohibits capturing biometric data without informed consent. Reports from WebProNews in October 2025 confirm that Google’s Ask Photos is blocked in these two states due to these laws, highlighting the implications of past settlements for the tech industry.
This situation emphasizes the significant regulatory challenges that AI developers face. As noted by WebProNews, companies like Google must navigate a fragmented legal landscape to avoid costly litigation.
Broader Implications for AI Innovation
The restrictions on Google’s AI tools aren’t unique; similar issues have plagued other applications. For instance, a tweet from 2018 pointed out that Google’s Arts & Culture app’s face-matching feature was disabled in Texas due to biometric laws. Industry insiders view this regulatory environment as a potential harbinger for the future of AI development.
A 9to5Google report from October 16, 2025, indicated that the Face Grouping feature in Photos may be at the heart of the issue, with Google opting for caution to ensure compliance with local laws. Furthermore, Google’s AI-powered Ask Photos and conversational editing features are integral to its Pixel lineup, though their availability remains limited in certain jurisdictions.
To mitigate risks, tech companies are adapting their strategies. Following a $650 million settlement in 2021 related to BIPA, Meta disabled certain features in Illinois. Google, in a blog post from August 20, 2025, confirmed that while AI edits through voice or text can be used globally, sensitive regions remain excluded.
Experts suggest that Google could seek user consent for biometric data collection; however, the company has opted for restrictions to evade potential legal issues. As reported by Startupnews.fyi on November 16, 2025, residents of Texas and Illinois currently lack access to this innovative AI editing tool.
Evolving Legal Landscape
As AI increasingly permeates consumer technology, more states are tightening regulations. Colorado’s 2024 law concerning deepfakes, as mentioned by Secretary of State Jena Griswold in X posts, mandates disclaimers for AI-generated political imagery, indicating a trend toward greater scrutiny of AI technologies.
The absence of Ask Photos and Conversational Editing in states like Texas and Illinois due to privacy laws has frustrated many users, with discussions on platforms like X revealing heightened awareness and discontent regarding these restrictions. Notably, in November 2025, Engadget covered the introduction of six new AI features in Google Photos, but did not specify the state exclusions.
Legal scholars anticipate that more states may adopt BIPA-like measures in the future. CNET highlighted that without federal uniformity, technology firms will likely continue to geo-fence their features, complicating access for users across the U.S.
As Google navigates ongoing litigation, the company’s strategy may evolve. A Nerdschalk article from November 11, 2025, detailed the rollout of AI upgrades for U.S. users in specific regions, emphasizing the need to address existing gaps while enhancing user experiences.
Ultimately, this patchwork of regulations could catalyze a call for national privacy standards, striving to balance innovation with user protection. As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into daily life, resolving these conflicts will be crucial for companies like Google to provide seamless services nationwide.
