Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Top Stories

Michael Burry Bets $1.1B Against Nvidia, Questions AI Stock Sustainability

Michael Burry bets $1.1B against Nvidia, questioning the AI stock’s sustainability as broader market volatility echoes his bearish predictions.

Michael Burry, renowned for his role in “The Big Short,” has recently become a focal point in the financial community, particularly on social media. His bearish stance on the AI sector, targeting companies like NVIDIA, has sparked considerable discussion and debate, notably after a notable stock market dip attributed in part to his comments.

Understanding Burry’s Current Influence

Michael Burry gained fame for accurately predicting the collapse of the mid-2000s U.S. housing market, a feat that was chronicled in both the book and film “The Big Short,” featuring Christian Bale as Burry. Frequently vocal about impending market crashes and recessions, he has adopted the moniker “Cassandra” on social media platform X, alluding to the Greek mythological figure cursed to speak the truth yet remain disbelieved.

After a two-year hiatus from X, Burry resurfaced in late October, promptly voicing concerns about a potential bubble in AI stocks. His hedge fund, Scion Asset Management, disclosed that it held bearish put options on NVIDIA and Palantir, with a total notional value amounting to $1.1 billion by the end of September. Following this revelation, Palantir’s CEO Alex Karp dismissed Burry’s strategies as “batshit crazy,” prompting Burry to retort that Karp couldn’t “crack a simple 13F,” a reference to the SEC form detailing institutional investment holdings.

Subsequently, Burry clarified he was no longer short on Palantir, having exited his puts in October. He also ceased Scion’s SEC registration, effectively closing the fund to outside investments. Most recently, he criticized NVIDIA following its third-quarter earnings report, questioning the durability of its chips and its financial dealings with other AI firms, as well as citing concerns over stock dilution.

Despite a surge in NVIDIA shares following its earnings announcement—where it reported an increase of over 5%—the stock experienced a reversal. Investors were unsettled by analysts’ warnings regarding rising inventories and deferred revenues, which raised skepticism about the sustainability of NVIDIA’s growth trajectory. On Thursday, while NVIDIA shares initially opened higher, they ultimately ended the day down by about 3%, followed by an additional 1% drop on Friday.

This volatility had a ripple effect on the broader stock market. The S&P 500 saw a significant shift, erasing a 1.9% gain to close 1.6% lower, while the Nasdaq Composite faced a similar fate, going from a 2.6% increase to a 2.2% decline—the largest intraday fluctuation since April. The market’s reaction has led some analysts to reconsider Burry’s critiques of the AI boom, suggesting he may have been onto something.

While his views have attracted both ridicule and support, with some defending his acumen, it’s important to note that Burry was not the sole catalyst for the market’s downturn. Broader economic indicators, such as the U.S. unemployment rate hitting an almost four-year high of 4.4% in September, also contributed to investor sentiment.

As Burry continues to navigate this tumultuous financial landscape, his followers on X anticipate further insights. His bio hints at upcoming revelations, stating: “’Unchained’ coming maybe sooner than Nov 25th.”

In summary, Michael Burry’s bold assertions about the AI sector have reignited discussions around market valuations and the sustainability of tech giants like NVIDIA and Palantir. As the financial community watches closely, his ability to influence market sentiment remains a crucial element in the evolving landscape of AI investments.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Generative

91% of Hong Kong companies plan to increase AI budgets by 2026, yet only 11% cite ROI as a key driver, highlighting strategic misalignment.

AI Business

SAVVI AI's CEO Maya Mikhailov warns that while AI simplifies software writing, it fails to resolve the costly complexities of running enterprise applications.

Top Stories

Runway AI faces a proposed class action lawsuit for allegedly scraping YouTube videos to train its generative AI models, raising critical copyright concerns.

AI Technology

Texas Instruments agrees to acquire Silicon Labs for $7 billion to significantly enhance its AI-driven embedded wireless connectivity portfolio.

AI Generative

Alberta's privacy watchdog joins 61 global regulators to issue a critical warning on AI image risks, urging safeguards against non-consensual content.

AI Research

Flapping Airplanes launches with $180M in funding to revolutionize AI training by enhancing data efficiency and mimicking human learning processes

AI Marketing

Marketers are transitioning to Cost Per Sale campaigns, leveraging AI for up to 15% revenue growth through enhanced personalization and predictive analytics.

AI Business

Vanguard's High Dividend Yield ETF delivers 12.1% annualized returns as SaaS valuations plummet, safeguarding investors amid the AI-driven SaaS-pocalypse.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.