Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Cybersecurity

CIOs Expect AI Cyber Attacks Soon; Only One-Third Feel Prepared to Respond

CIOs report 51% foresee AI-driven cyber attacks in the next year, yet only one-third feel equipped to counteract these imminent threats.

Managed security services provider LevelBlue has released research indicating that many Chief Information Officers (CIOs) anticipate an increase in AI-driven cyber attacks in the near future, yet a significantly lower number feel prepared to respond effectively. The report, titled Persona Spotlight: CIO, reveals that 51 percent of CIOs believe AI-powered attacks are likely to occur within the next 12 months, while only one-third express confidence in their organization’s readiness to handle such threats.

The findings highlight a widening gap between the rapid adoption of AI technologies and the maturity of cyber risk management practices within organizations. As CIOs often spearhead the integration of automation and data-driven systems into their operations, these advancements can inadvertently expand attack surfaces and complicate governance frameworks.

The survey underscores the vital role CIOs attribute to AI in business strategy. Approximately 71 percent assert that their adaptable cybersecurity approaches empower the organization to take greater innovation risks. However, confidence wanes when assessing their capabilities against attackers employing AI techniques. Only 20 percent claim to be highly effective in defending against AI-enabled adversaries, a sentiment echoed by the same proportion who feel adept at leveraging AI for cybersecurity enhancement.

As the complexity and volume of threats rise, many CIOs foresee an increased reliance on AI-driven security tools. About 72 percent believe these technologies will be crucial for improving detection and response efforts. This dual role of AI—fostering new digital services while simultaneously facilitating new forms of cybercrime—illustrates a pressing concern among IT leaders, many of whom feel their current security measures are insufficient.

In line with these sentiments, the research indicates a trend toward integrating cybersecurity into broader business transformation initiatives. Nearly half of the CIOs surveyed (49 percent) plan to prioritize the integration of cybersecurity across various lines of business and projects within the next year, a figure that exceeds the average for cross-leadership initiatives.

Engagement at the board level has also emerged as a key focus area, with 39 percent of respondents indicating plans to enhance discussions on cyber resilience within executive circles. Publicized cyber attacks have notably heightened the profile of cybersecurity, with 73 percent of CIOs acknowledging that such incidents have escalated executive-level conversations. Nevertheless, internal challenges persist: 47 percent cited a lack of prioritization from executive leadership concerning cyber resilience as a significant obstacle.

Measurement and alignment issues remain critical. Fewer than half of the respondents reported that their key performance indicators effectively connect cybersecurity efforts to overall business outcomes. Nearly half (49 percent) indicated that their organization’s risk appetite does not align with its cybersecurity risk management strategies.

Investment priorities reflect a commitment to addressing these challenges. The report indicates that CIOs are making moderate to significant investments in both foundational and AI-driven security initiatives. Approximately 80 percent are enhancing cyber resilience processes organization-wide, while 78 percent are prioritizing application security.

AI-specific initiatives are also gaining traction, with 76 percent investing in machine learning for improved threat detection and 70 percent deploying generative AI to combat sophisticated social engineering attacks. The trend suggests a shift towards greater reliance on external support for managing high-impact incidents, with 47 percent planning to collaborate with incident response specialists over the next two years, a notable increase from 23 percent in the previous year.

The appetite for utilizing threat intelligence providers is also on the rise, with 36 percent indicating plans to partner with such organizations in the upcoming two years, compared to 26 percent in the past year. Concerns surrounding software supply chain security are particularly pronounced, as over half of CIOs (56 percent) believe that software supply chain attacks are imminent, yet only 22 percent report having a highly effective perspective on their software supply chain.

Investment in software supply chain security remains robust, with 70 percent of CIOs allocating moderate to significant resources to enhance this area. Interestingly, only 25 percent acknowledged that AI has introduced additional risks to the software supply chain since its adoption.

The report advocates for improved executive alignment, operational discipline, and enhanced visibility across third-party dependencies. It calls for organizations to educate leadership on AI-related risks and opportunities within the realm of cyber resilience and emphasizes the importance of integrating cybersecurity into all business functions. Furthermore, it highlights the value of external expertise for incident preparedness and understanding new threats, along with the necessity of stronger visibility and due diligence in managing software supply chains.

“CIOs sit at the intersection of innovation and risk. AI presents enormous opportunities to drive efficiency and growth, but it also increases adversary sophistication. Organizations that modernize security operations, strengthen supply chain transparency, and align executive priorities will be better positioned to lead confidently in an AI-driven economy,” said Kory Daniels, Chief Security & Trust Officer at LevelBlue.

See also
Rachel Torres
Written By

At AIPressa, my work focuses on exploring the paradox of AI in cybersecurity: it's both our best defense and our greatest threat. I've closely followed how AI systems detect vulnerabilities in milliseconds while attackers simultaneously use them to create increasingly sophisticated malware. My approach: explaining technical complexities in an accessible way without losing the urgency of the topic. When I'm not researching the latest AI-driven threats, I'm probably testing security tools or reading about the next attack vector keeping CISOs awake at night.

You May Also Like

AI Marketing

AI tools like Google Analytics 4 and Adobe Experience Cloud are revolutionizing digital marketing analytics, boosting ROI by up to 30% through enhanced targeting...

AI Technology

Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang asserts AI enhances rather than threatens traditional software, defying investor fears amid the company's $2 trillion valuation surge.

AI Generative

Samsung introduces auto-tagging for AI-generated photos in the Galaxy S26, aiming to combat misinformation with visible labels on edited images.

AI Business

Software stocks plummet 80% as AI disrupts long-standing DCF terminal value assumptions, forcing investors to rethink traditional valuation models.

AI Regulation

Ohio's bipartisan House Bill 524 aims to regulate AI systems suggesting self-harm, responding to 1,777 suicide deaths in 2023 and alarming youth risks.

Top Stories

Google DeepMind's new study reveals critical challenges in AI's ethical reasoning, highlighting that current chatbots may only mimic morality without true understanding.

AI Education

Education Perfect's report reveals 77% of Canadian teachers feel overwhelmed by rapid AI adoption, highlighting critical governance gaps in educational technology integration

AI Marketing

AI integration in social media marketing boosts engagement by 80%, enabling companies to automate content and optimize campaigns for significant revenue growth.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.