In a recent panel discussion at the Urban Consulate in Detroit, renowned sociologist Tressie McMillan Cottom articulated a critical view of the future shaped by artificial intelligence, asserting it will primarily benefit the wealthy. Cottom’s remarks come at a time when narratives surrounding AI’s impact on society are as varied as the startups producing the technology. Many proponents predict a utopian future free from burdens, while skeptics warn of potential existential threats.
Cottom contended that the optimistic visions of AI’s capabilities often mask a deeper anxiety among affluent and powerful individuals regarding their control over society. “When people try to sell you on the idea that the future is already settled, it’s because it is deeply unsettled,” she stated. The sociologist emphasized that the prevailing narrative—that AI is an inevitable and uncontested force—serves to reify the power dynamics that exist today.
Her critique extends to the notion that accepting this predetermined future is tantamount to relinquishing agency. “If they can get us to accept that the future is already settled — AI is already here, the end is already here — then we will create that for them,” Cottom argued, calling for a collective act of refusal against such narratives. This sentiment was met with applause from the audience, indicating a resonance with her call to challenge the status quo.
As AI technology continues to evolve, particularly with large language models like ChatGPT, Cottom highlighted that the trajectory is not as certain as some might suggest. Recent updates to these models have demonstrated limitations, underscoring a plateau in development that raises questions about the future efficacy and application of AI technologies.
Moreover, Cottom’s perspective sheds light on the darker implications of a future dominated by AI. She articulated a fear that the promise of AI could lead to a society where human beings are treated inhumanely. “The proposal for a post-human future is one where there will be human beings who will just be treated inhumanely,” she stated. By framing the conversation around AI in these terms, Cottom insists that we must recognize the humanity in all individuals, irrespective of technological advancements.
Drawing historical parallels, Cottom referenced the myth of chattel slavery, once seen as a natural order enforced by the elite. “I think that being Black is an act of refusal, I think we know how to refuse,” she noted, suggesting that society at large could learn from this history of resistance. Her comments imply that the struggle against oppressive systems—be they historical or technological—requires a conscious refusal to accept predetermined roles or futures.
While Cottom’s analysis may seem bleak—pointing toward a reality where billionaires leverage AI for control—she also offered a vision of hope. “I think refusing is actually the more hopeful, expansive vision of the future,” she asserted. This perspective challenges the prevailing narratives that suggest technological determinism is the only path forward.
As debates around AI’s role in society continue, Cottom’s insights underscore the need for vigilance and critical engagement with the technology shaping our lives. Her call to action invites individuals to recognize their agency and refuse narratives that seek to confine their future. In an era where the implications of AI are still unfolding, Cottom champions a collective refusal that could pave the way for a more equitable future.
More on AI: Google CEO says we’re all going to have to suffer through it as AI puts society through the woodchipper.
See also
Shield AI’s New CEO Gary Steele Aims for $1B Revenue by 2028, Targets Global Defense Contracts
AI Infrastructure Scrutiny and $10B Google-Palo Alto Deal Shape Holiday Trading Landscape
Alphabet Set to Outperform Nvidia as AI Infrastructure Investment Surges Ahead of 2026
xAI Faces Sales Challenges Despite Musk’s 2026 AGI Ambitions and $230 Billion Valuation
Notre Dame Secures $50.8M Grant to Pioneer Faith-Based AI Ethics Initiative
