Security teams are facing increasing pressures tied to the use of artificial intelligence (AI), geopolitical instability, and the expanding threat of cybercrime, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026. The findings indicate that these challenges extend beyond mere technical controls, highlighting a need for a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity.
Respondents to the report perceive AI as a catalyst for change in both offensive and defensive cybersecurity tactics. New AI-driven tools enable security teams to process alerts, detect phishing attempts, and respond to incidents with greater speed. However, the adoption of AI also introduces vulnerabilities, particularly concerning data exposure, model misuse, and automation errors. Security leaders express heightened concern about the risks associated with generative AI systems, citing data leakage and the misuse of proprietary information as paramount threats. Cybercriminals are leveraging AI to enhance social engineering attacks, create convincing impersonation content, and automate reconnaissance, leading to sophisticated threats.
“The weaponization of AI, persistent geopolitical friction, and systemic supply chain risks are upending traditional cyber defenses,” stated Paolo Dal Cin, global lead at Accenture Cybersecurity. He emphasized that C-suite executives must transition from conventional cyber protection to a more resilient approach powered by advanced AI to counteract AI-driven threats.
Organizations are increasingly formalizing their AI deployment processes, with more teams conducting security reviews of AI tools prior to use. Some are shifting toward ongoing assessments rather than relying solely on initial evaluations. Despite these improvements, many organizations continue to adopt AI without formal security reviews, leaving critical gaps as usage expands. AI is already integral to various security operations, including email security, anomaly detection, and behavioral monitoring. However, a lack of skilled personnel hampers broader AI adoption, especially in teams that struggle to manage AI systems or validate automated outputs.
Geopolitical instability remains a significant factor influencing cybersecurity strategy. Organizations are now factoring in nation-state activities, potential infrastructure disruptions, and misinformation when assessing risks. This geopolitical landscape affects vendor decisions, intelligence sharing, and investment priorities. Larger organizations, in particular, report being more susceptible to geopolitical conditions, as global operations heighten exposure to sanctions, regional conflicts, and varying regulations. Consequently, these entities are adjusting their strategies, enhancing threat intelligence efforts, and collaborating with government partners.
Confidence in national preparedness for major cyber incidents is uneven across regions. While some respondents express strong trust in their public sector’s readiness, others voice concerns about decreasing confidence, with public-sector organizations notably reporting lower self-assessment of their resilience in protecting critical infrastructure. Despite the high threat levels, many organizations are cutting security spending in response to economic and political uncertainties, further constraining security teams as they navigate a complex landscape of risks.
Cyber-enabled fraud has emerged as one of the most pressing concerns identified in the study. Many respondents reported experiencing personal or professional exposure to fraud over the past year, with prevalent methods including phishing, payment fraud, and identity theft. Notably, CEOs ranked cyber-enabled fraud and phishing as their primary cyber risks for 2026, surpassing concerns related to ransomware. Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) continue to prioritize ransomware and supply chain disruptions, reflecting a divergence in their operational focuses.
The rise in fraud is closely linked to advancements in AI, which enable criminals to scale scams, localize content, and mimic trusted voices with unprecedented accuracy. This trend increases exposure across various regions and demographics. In response, law enforcement agencies have ramped up cooperation during 2025, leading to several coordinated disruptions of cybercrime infrastructures. These efforts signal stronger international collaboration, although the scale of cybercriminal activity continues to expand.
Amid these challenges, organizations report gradual improvements in cyber resilience. A notable portion of respondents now believe their resilience meets or exceeds baseline expectations, although major cyber incidents during 2025 caused significant operational disruptions across various sectors, including retail, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure. These incidents underscore the persistent vulnerabilities that even well-prepared organizations face.
Dependence on supply chains remains a key concern, with resilient organizations prioritizing third-party risk assessments, supplier evaluations, and security’s role in procurement decisions. Conversely, less resilient organizations cite funding constraints and skills shortages as significant barriers to progress. The presence of legacy systems further complicates resilience efforts, as many organizations operate hybrid environments where newer technologies coexist with outdated infrastructure.
Finally, the study reveals a widening inequity in cybersecurity capabilities across regions and sectors. Organizations outside North America and Europe often report limited access to skilled personnel, hindering their ability to adopt AI effectively, respond to incidents, and participate in collaborative defense initiatives. Josephine Teo, Minister for Digital Development and Information in Singapore, commented on the dual nature of AI, stating, “When deployed responsibly, these technologies can strengthen cyber defenses by supporting faster detection and response. But if misused or poorly governed, they can also introduce serious risks, from data leaks to cyberattacks.” She emphasized that governments must adopt a forward-looking and collaborative approach to ensure that AI enhances cyber resilience while minimizing transnational risks.
See also
AI Transforms Health Care Workflows, Elevating Patient Care and Outcomes
Tamil Nadu’s Anbil Mahesh Seeks Exemption for In-Service Teachers from TET Requirements
Top AI Note-Taking Apps of 2026: Boost Productivity with 95% Accurate Transcriptions


















































