In January 2026, Tom Fox will host a series titled “31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program,” aimed at enhancing corporate compliance practices. Each day throughout the month, Fox will present a key element of a best-practice compliance program, culminating in a comprehensive guide by the end of January. The series, delivered through short podcasts averaging 6-8 minutes, is designed to provide listeners with actionable insights that can be implemented at little or no cost, ultimately aiding organizations in updating their compliance frameworks.
Today’s installment, Day 27, focuses on the escalating significance and responsibilities of the compliance function within corporations. Fox emphasizes the necessity for sufficient staffing, resources, and independence in compliance roles, reflecting growing concerns among regulators and stakeholders about corporate governance and ethics. This comes in light of various regulatory expectations, particularly from the Department of Justice (DOJ), which has heightened its scrutiny of compliance programs across industries.
A central theme of the episode is the DOJ’s expectations for compliance programs. The agency has outlined clear criteria regarding what constitutes an effective compliance program, stressing the importance of transparency and accountability. Companies are increasingly required to demonstrate a commitment to ethical practices and the implementation of robust compliance measures to mitigate risks. This shift underscores the need for organizations to invest not just in compliance technology, but also in human resources that can effectively oversee and enforce these critical initiatives.
Funding and resources for compliance are also critical topics discussed in the podcast. Fox points out that many organizations often underfund their compliance functions, which can lead to ineffective programs and increased vulnerability to regulatory penalties. By adequately resourcing compliance teams, companies can better navigate the complexities of regulatory environments. The dialogue suggests that organizations should view compliance investment not merely as a cost, but as a strategic imperative that can protect them from potential legal and financial repercussions.
The structure and authority of compliance programs are further examined, with an emphasis on ensuring that compliance officers have the independence required to operate effectively. Fox argues that compliance officers should possess a direct line to senior management and the board of directors, which is essential for fostering a culture of compliance throughout the organization. The episode warns that without this independence, compliance efforts may be undermined, leading to possible failures in detecting or preventing misconduct.
As organizations prepare to adapt to evolving regulatory landscapes, the insights from this series could prove invaluable. The necessity for effective compliance mechanisms is underscored by increasing scrutiny from regulatory bodies and growing public expectation for corporate accountability. By engaging with the series and implementing the discussed best practices, organizations can fortify their compliance programs and align themselves with leading standards in corporate governance.
Listeners are also incentivized to delve deeper into compliance literature, as they can receive a 20% discount on “The Compliance Handbook,” 6th edition, through a special link provided in the podcast. As the discussion on corporate compliance continues to evolve, the importance of these programs will only grow, reflecting broader societal demands for ethical business practices.
See also
OpenAI’s Rogue AI Safeguards: Decoding the 2025 Safety Revolution
US AI Developments in 2025 Set Stage for 2026 Compliance Challenges and Strategies
Trump Drafts Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Centralizing Authority Under Federal Control
California Court Rules AI Misuse Heightens Lawyer’s Responsibilities in Noland Case
Policymakers Urged to Establish Comprehensive Regulations for AI in Mental Health
