As the UK government grapples with increasing scrutiny over AI and copyright issues, two initiatives presented at the London Book Fair aim to spotlight the ongoing conflict and propose potential solutions. A notable protest, spearheaded by composer and campaigner Ed Newton-Rex, has seen around 10,000 writers, including notable figures like Kazuo Ishiguro and Philippa Gregory, lending their names to an empty book titled “Don’t Steal This Book,” which is being circulated at the Fair.
This initiative is designed to pressure the government, which has suggested a “commercial research exception” to copyright laws, potentially easing restrictions on AI companies’ use of copyrighted materials. Newton-Rex argues that generative AI is a direct threat to the livelihoods of creators, stating, “This is not a victimless crime. Generative AI competes with the people whose work it is trained on, robbing them of their livelihoods. The government must protect the UK’s creatives and refuse to legalise the theft of creative work by AI companies.”
The urgency of this issue has been underscored by a recent warning from a House of Lords committee, which characterized generative AI as posing a “clear and present danger” to the UK’s creative industries. In response, a government spokesperson emphasized the need for a copyright framework that protects human creativity while also fostering innovation. However, sources indicate that upcoming reforms to AI copyright laws, originally slated for announcement on March 18, may be postponed following significant backlash from writers, artists, and musicians, as well as the ongoing Lords debate. “Copyright is going to be kicked down the road,” one source noted.
Amidst this backdrop, the Publishers’ Licensing Services (PLS), a non-profit trade body, has proposed a collective licensing scheme aimed at addressing the challenges posed by AI. This initiative has garnered support from Newton-Rex and several major publishing trade organizations. The PLS scheme is designed as an opt-in framework for publishers, allowing AI developers to train their models on textual content in exchange for payment to those publishers.
The proposed scheme builds on the UK’s existing voluntary collective licensing model and aims to create a legal pathway for AI companies to access and utilize content under clearly defined terms. It would also include a licensing agreement and an online content store to facilitate this exchange. The overarching goal is to ensure that both authors and publishers can share in the value generated by AI technologies while providing a lawful means for developers to obtain training material. Importantly, this initiative is not intended to replace existing contracts between individual publishers and AI firms.
Tom West, chief executive of PLS, remarked on the necessity of collaboration in this rapidly evolving landscape. “The pace of change is rapid, and publishers must remain active participants in shaping how their content is used,” he stated. He emphasized that the first stage of this initiative is focused on engagement and collaboration, noting that by opting in, publishers can help shape a collective approach that ensures lawful usage of their content in AI models while also ensuring fair remuneration.
In a press release, PLS urged publishers to participate in the initiative, allowing them to influence the next stages of this licensing framework. As the dialogue around AI and copyright continues to develop, the outcomes of these initiatives may significantly impact the future of creative industries in the UK and their interaction with rapidly advancing technologies.
See also
OpenAI’s Rogue AI Safeguards: Decoding the 2025 Safety Revolution
US AI Developments in 2025 Set Stage for 2026 Compliance Challenges and Strategies
Trump Drafts Executive Order to Block State AI Regulations, Centralizing Authority Under Federal Control
California Court Rules AI Misuse Heightens Lawyer’s Responsibilities in Noland Case
Policymakers Urged to Establish Comprehensive Regulations for AI in Mental Health
