Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Research

One in Four Brits Trust AI Over Doctors for Medical Advice, Survey Shows

A Medichecks survey reveals that 23.8% of Brits would trust AI over their doctor for medical advice, highlighting a significant shift in healthcare perceptions.

One in four Brits would trust AI over their doctor if the two gave different medical advice, according to new research. A survey by Medichecks found that more than half of respondents are turning to AI for medical advice, with 55.7 percent indicating they have already used tools such as ChatGPT, and an overwhelming 95.7 percent expressing willingness to do so again.

When faced with conflicting advice from AI and their general practitioner, 41.7 percent of respondents admitted they would not know whom to believe, while 23.8 percent stated they would favor AI’s recommendations over those of their doctor. This raises important questions about the evolving role of AI in healthcare.

Dr. Natasha Fernando, medical director at Medichecks, commented on the implications of these findings. “AI can be a helpful tool for learning more about your health or preparing questions before a medical appointment, but it should never replace proper medical care,” she said. She emphasized that a GP’s expertise involves considering a patient’s full medical history and providing personalized assessments that AI cannot replicate.

“Medicine is rarely black and white. Two people can present with very similar symptoms but require completely different care,” Dr. Fernando noted. AI lacks the ability to interpret context—such as a patient’s lifestyle and subtle warning signs—that a clinician would assess during a consultation.

The survey revealed generational differences in AI usage for medical queries, with nearly three-quarters of individuals aged 25 to 34 having relied on AI, compared to just 34.9 percent of those over 75. Gender disparities were also evident, as 63.7 percent of men reported using AI for health advice, versus 50.9 percent of women, who expressed concerns about the decreasing personal aspect of healthcare in a digital age.

Looking ahead, more than half of the respondents (51.7 percent) believe that AI will surpass doctors in making accurate health predictions by 2030, while only 19.1 percent maintain greater trust in human physicians. Current research indicates that generative AI systems can achieve diagnostic accuracy levels similar to non-expert doctors, averaging around 52 percent. In some complex cases, specialist AI diagnostic tools have reported accuracy rates as high as 85 percent.

Despite the increasing public reliance on AI, the technology is already integrated into various aspects of modern healthcare. In England, AI aids in stroke units to analyze brain scans, while radiology departments incorporate it into clinical practice. An AI system named Mia, utilized to analyze mammograms at NHS Grampian, successfully reviewed scans of over 10,000 women, identifying every case of breast cancer detected by radiologists and discovering 11 additional cases initially missed.

However, the technology is not without its pitfalls. Google’s Med-Gemini model, for example, incorrectly identified abnormalities in a non-existent body structure known as the “basilar ganglia,” showcasing the risks associated with AI “hallucinations,” where incorrect information is generated.

Dr. Fernando cautioned against over-reliance on AI, stating, “AI does not take responsibility for the outcome of your care. Doctors do. That accountability is fundamental in medicine.” She advised that for worrying symptoms, the safest course of action is always to consult a healthcare professional capable of a comprehensive assessment.

Looking to the future, Dr. Fernando posited that while AI may serve as an increasingly valuable tool in healthcare—particularly for analyzing large datasets and aiding decision-making—it should work in conjunction with human clinicians rather than replace them. “AI can help people become more informed about their health, which is positive,” she concluded, stressing that AI should serve as a starting point for discussions with healthcare professionals rather than the final authority.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Business

Red Hat advances enterprise AI with Small Language Models that achieve over 98% validity in structured tasks, prioritizing reliability and data sovereignty.

AI Research

OpenAI's o1 model achieves 81.6% diagnostic accuracy in emergency situations, surpassing human doctors and signaling a major shift in medical practice.

AI Marketing

BusySeed unveils Rankxa, a tool tracking brand visibility across AI-generated responses, revealing 90% of brands lack meaningful presence in this new landscape.

AI Regulation

Korea Venture Investment Corp. unveils AI-driven fund management systems by integrating Nvidia H200 GPUs to enhance efficiency and support unicorn growth.

AI Technology

Apple raises Mac mini starting price to $799 amid AI-driven inventory shortages, eliminating the $599 model in response to surging demand for advanced computing.

AI Research

IBM launches a Chicago Quantum Hub to create 750 AI jobs and expands its MIT partnership to advance quantum computing and AI integration.

AI Government

71% of Australian employees use generative AI daily, but only 36% trust its implementation, highlighting urgent calls for better policy frameworks and safeguards.

AI Technology

A1 Public Relations helps entertainment brands enhance AI visibility in 2026 by integrating structured content and fresh, authoritative media, ensuring they are recognized by...

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.