Blue Prince’s publisher, Raw Fury, has vehemently denied allegations that the acclaimed independent game utilized Generative AI in its development. The controversy erupted after the recent revocation of awards for Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 at the Indie Game Awards, which had been disqualified due to claims of AI-generated content. This incident sparked wider discussions about the ethical implications of AI in video game production, further intensified by Larian Studios’ admission of using Generative AI for pre-production of Baldur’s Gate 3, which met with considerable public backlash.
The Indie Game Awards previously mandated that participating titles must confirm they did not incorporate AI technologies, making the revocation of Clair Obscur’s accolades for Best Independent Game and Best Debut Indie Game particularly significant. As a result, Blue Prince, developed by Dogubomb, was named the winner of the Best Independent Game award, a recognition that positioned it among the top-reviewed games of 2025.
However, allegations surfaced that Dogubomb might have used Generative AI in Blue Prince, following a controversial article by The Escapist. The claims prompted Raw Fury to take a stand, asserting that there was no basis for the accusations. The publisher’s statement on social media emphasized, “For people that need confirmation: There is no AI used in Blue Prince. The game was built and crafted with full human instinct by Tonda Ros (Dogubomb) & his team. It is the result of eight years of development, fuelled by imagination and creativity, and we are extremely proud of what Tonda has achieved.”
This robust defense underscores Raw Fury’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of their game in an increasingly scrutinized industry. With the Indie Game Awards adopting stringent criteria against AI use, the allegations against Blue Prince lacked substantiation, raising concerns about the potential impact of misinformation on a developer’s reputation so closely after a significant triumph. The ongoing discourse surrounding AI’s role in creative endeavors is expected to persist, especially as the industry navigates the complexities and implications of integrating such technologies.
As the debate continues, the broader implications of these allegations for the gaming community remain to be fully understood. With the growing integration of AI in various sectors, the gaming industry faces increasing scrutiny regarding authenticity and creativity. Observers may look forward to how developers balance innovation with ethical considerations in future projects, particularly in light of the stringent standards set by award organizations.
What are your thoughts on the allegations regarding AI usage in Blue Prince? Should it have received the Best Independent Game award at the Indie Game Awards? Readers are encouraged to share their views in the comments and engage with the ongoing conversation on gaming forums.
For insights into other instances of alleged AI usage in gaming, including projects like Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 and Battlefield 6, stay tuned for more coverage. Don’t forget to subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest updates in the gaming industry.
See also
IntraGPT Named Most Secure Local AI LLM by AI Magazine Netherlands, Sets New Data Privacy Standard
Latin America’s 2026 Financial Stability at Risk Due to GenAI and Fintech Vulnerabilities
OpenAI’s Sora Generates AI Videos of Celebrities, Raising Ethical Concerns Over Likeness Control
Artists Seek Alternatives as AI Image Generators Enforce Stricter Content Restrictions
ROSOrin Launches Versatile Multimodal Platform for Advanced Robotics Education and AI Integration
