Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

Government Urges Musk to Address Grok AI’s Production of Sexualised Images Amid Growing Concerns

UK Technology Secretary Liz Kendall demands immediate action from X to combat Grok AI’s generation of non-consensual sexualized images, amid calls for regulatory accountability.

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, is facing mounting pressure to address the misuse of its artificial intelligence tool, Grok, which has been implicated in generating “absolutely appalling” fake sexualized images. UK Technology Secretary Liz Kendall highlighted the urgency of the situation, emphasizing the need for immediate action to prevent the proliferation of such content online.

In a statement issued on Monday, Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, voiced “serious concerns” regarding Grok, noting that the AI tool has been used to create “undressed images of people and sexualized images of children.” Users, predominantly women, have reported instances of accounts generating images of them in compromising situations without their consent since the beginning of the year.

Ms. Kendall described the recent developments as “unacceptable in decent society,” stating, “No one should have to go through the ordeal of seeing intimate deepfakes of themselves online.” She reiterated that the responsibility lies with X to tackle this issue promptly, affirming Ofcom’s investigation and her full support for any enforcement actions deemed necessary.

Reports indicate that multiple users have expressed outrage after non-consensual deepfakes depicting them in bikinis surfaced on the platform. In response to these concerns, X’s official safety account released a statement outlining its policy on illegal content. It declared that the platform actively removes such material, permanently suspends offending accounts, and collaborates with local governments and law enforcement as required.

Despite these assurances, a post on the Grok X account acknowledged that there had been “isolated cases where users prompted for and received AI images depicting minors in minimal clothing.” The account asserted that while existing safeguards are in place, ongoing improvements are needed to completely block such requests.

Under the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act, which has been in effect since July, sharing intimate imagery without consent is considered a criminal offense, even when produced using AI technology. French ministers recently escalated the issue by reporting sexually explicit content generated by Grok to prosecutors, labeling it “manifestly illegal” and “sexual and sexist.”

As scrutiny intensifies, questions arise as to whether X can be compelled to take action against the dissemination of such illegal content. The Online Safety Act stipulates fines of up to £18 million or 10% of a company’s qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever is greater, for platforms that permit the sharing of illegal material. This regulation applies even to companies based outside the UK, provided they cater to a significant number of UK users or pose a risk to them.

The European Union’s Digital Services Act mirrors these regulations, offering similar enforcement capabilities. Last month, X faced a €120 million (£104 million) fine for breaching the DSA, highlighting the increasing global accountability for digital platforms.

In the United States, advocacy groups are calling for government action against xAI, the company behind Grok. The Consumer Federation of America (CFA) urged the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Department of Justice, and state Attorneys General to take swift measures against the company. Ben Winters, Director of AI and Data Privacy at CFA, criticized xAI, stating, “AI is no different than any other product – the company has chosen to break the law and must be held accountable.”

The growing controversy surrounding the misuse of AI-generated content underscores the urgent need for regulatory frameworks that can effectively address these emerging challenges. As both public and governmental scrutiny intensifies, the actions taken by X and regulatory bodies could set significant precedents for how AI technologies are governed in the future.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Government

UK government weighs banning AI chatbots for under-16s as part of the Online Safety Act amid rising calls for enhanced online protections for children.

AI Technology

Tesla unveils AI6 and AI6.5 chips, leveraging 2nm technology from Samsung and TSMC to double performance and enhance memory bandwidth by an order of...

AI Regulation

Midland's advocacy group "Midland of Tomorrow," led by Eliel Rosa, seeks to regulate AI usage amid rising local concerns and the global impact of...

Top Stories

Amazon's new CEO Andy Jassy declares generative AI a “once-in-a-lifetime” technology, driving potential market valuation to $250 trillion by 2040.

AI Technology

TSMC reports a remarkable 58% profit surge to $35.9 billion and raises its revenue growth forecast to over 30%, highlighting its pivotal role in...

AI Regulation

Elon Musk advocates for "Universal High Income" funded by AI-driven economic growth to address impending unemployment, challenging traditional wealth distribution models.

AI Government

UK government unveils €573 million Sovereign AI initiative to boost British startups, with first investment in Callosum for vital AI infrastructure development

Top Stories

Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter files a complaint against Elon Musk's Grok AI for generating harmful content, highlighting urgent digital abuse concerns in Switzerland.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.