Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

AI Government

UK Government Considers AI Chatbot Ban for Under-16s Amid Growing Online Safety Concerns

UK government evaluates banning AI chatbot use for under-16s amid rising online safety concerns, with only 12% of feedback from youth in public consultation.

The UK government is considering banning children under the age of 16 from using AI chatbots as part of its broader effort to enhance online safety for young people. Technology minister Liz Kendall announced that officials are evaluating whether such restrictions should be implemented in line with similar age limits being discussed for social media platforms.

Ministers face escalating pressure to adopt measures reminiscent of Australia’s recent regulations limiting social media access for minors, amid rising concerns regarding the effects of technology on children’s well-being and development. A public consultation has been launched to gather feedback on a potential ban while also addressing how to mitigate addictive design features in AI chatbots and gaming applications.

On Sunday, Kendall confirmed the government’s intentions during an appearance on the BBC’s “Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg” program, stating, “We are certainly looking at whether there should be those age restrictions overall, as well as the individual features.” She emphasized that AI chatbots will fall under the purview of the Online Safety Act, which regulates harmful content, reinforcing that the focus is on the “how” rather than the “if” regarding legislative action.

Despite receiving nearly 50,000 responses to the consultation thus far, Kendall called for further input from young people, noting that only about 6,000 children have participated. She is scheduled to meet with youth representatives and the NSPCC at a summit titled “Childhood in the Age of AI” to further explore the implications of technology on young lives.

This initiative follows recent discussions by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, who convened technology executives at Downing Street to address the urgent risks children face on social media. Starmer conveyed that the current situation is untenable, although he could not commit to immediate actions before summer.

While there is a growing movement among parents advocating for restrictions on social media access for under-16s, some advocates caution against hastily adopting such measures. Critics highlighted that the government has not conducted sufficient internal analysis of the potential impacts of a ban, which could affect mental health, access to news, and the likelihood of young individuals circumventing restrictions.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology acknowledged in response to a Freedom of Information request that no modelling or analysis on the effects of a social media ban has been undertaken. The department stated that this absence stems from a lack of “clear, agreed evidence” on the matter, raising concerns about the effectiveness of any forthcoming regulations.

Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, a charity focused on improving online safety for youth, underscored the necessity of careful evaluation before implementing restrictions. “Parents are rightly demanding action from government to protect children online, but they want solutions to be effective and safe,” he remarked, urging that the ongoing consultation should serve as a platform for gathering comprehensive evidence.

As the government prepares to evaluate the feedback gathered over the consultation period, the issue of online safety for children remains a critical topic of discussion among policymakers, tech leaders, and advocacy groups. The outcome could set significant precedents regarding how technology interacts with young audiences, potentially reshaping the landscape of digital engagement for future generations.

See also
Staff
Written By

The AiPressa Staff team brings you comprehensive coverage of the artificial intelligence industry, including breaking news, research developments, business trends, and policy updates. Our mission is to keep you informed about the rapidly evolving world of AI technology.

You May Also Like

AI Government

UK government weighs banning AI chatbots for under-16s as part of the Online Safety Act amid rising calls for enhanced online protections for children.

AI Technology

Caason Group, led by CEO Craig Astill, pivots its investment strategy to enhance manufacturing resilience through AI and automation amid global supply chain shifts.

AI Government

UK government unveils €573 million Sovereign AI initiative to boost British startups, with first investment in Callosum for vital AI infrastructure development

Top Stories

Amazon commits AU$20 billion to renewable energy projects in Australia, becoming the largest corporate buyer of carbon-free energy by 2025.

AI Business

Megantic's whitepaper reveals that 64% of Australian shoppers now rely on AI for purchases, urging retailers to adopt Answer Engine Optimisation to avoid losing...

AI Technology

UK government unveils £500M Sovereign AI fund to propel domestic tech firms, targeting key investments for economic growth and global competitiveness.

AI Tools

AICD survey reveals 90% of directors foresee rising business costs, intensifying challenges from AI adoption and geopolitical instability, threatening Australia's productivity.

AI Tools

Thryv launches AI Lead Flow in Australia and New Zealand, empowering 59% of SMBs to enhance lead management and automate follow-ups for growth.

© 2025 AIPressa · Part of Buzzora Media · All rights reserved. This website provides general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult appropriate experts when needed. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of information on this site. Some images used on this website are generated with artificial intelligence and are illustrative in nature. They may not accurately represent the products, people, or events described in the articles.